Math 2.0

Field theory and polynomials Differential and difference algebra Theorem

Liouville's theorem (differential algebra)

Builds on Differential fieldDerivationField extensionAntiderivative

Statement

Let (F,∂)(F, \partial) be a differential field of characteristic 00, with derivation ∂\partial, and write u′=∂uu' = \partial u. A differential field extension E=F(t1,…,tm)E = F(t_1, \dots, t_m) of FF is elementary if, for each ii, with Fi−1=F(t1,…,ti−1)F_{i-1} = F(t_1, \dots, t_{i-1}), one of the following holds:

  1. tit_i is algebraic over Fi−1F_{i-1};
  2. ti′=u′/ut_i' = u'/u for some nonzero u∈Fi−1u \in F_{i-1} (a logarithm);
  3. ti′=u′tit_i' = u' t_i for some u∈Fi−1u \in F_{i-1} (an exponential).

Let α∈F\alpha \in F. Suppose that some elementary extension EE of FF with the same field of constants as FF contains an element yy with y′=αy' = \alpha. Then there are constants c1,…,cnc_1, \dots, c_n of FF, nonzero elements u1,…,un∈Fu_1, \dots, u_n \in F, and an element v∈Fv \in F such that α=v′+∑i=1nciui′ui.\alpha = v' + \sum_{i=1}^{n} c_i \frac{u_i'}{u_i}.

Remarks

The proof goes by induction on the length of the tower F⊆F1⊆⋯⊆EF \subseteq F_1 \subseteq \cdots \subseteq E. At each step one writes the antiderivative in terms of the last generator tit_i and compares coefficients. This works because derivatives of rational functions in a logarithm or an exponential have a controlled form. An algebraic step is removed by taking traces, which is where the characteristic 00 is used.

Example: over F=ℂ(x)F = \C(x) with ∂=d/dx\partial = d/dx, the element α=1/x\alpha = 1/x has the antiderivative log⁡x\log x, and indeed α=c1u1′/u1\alpha = c_1 u_1'/u_1 with c1=1c_1 = 1, u1=xu_1 = x, v=0v = 0. The theorem is the tool that proves that e−x2e^{-x^2}, ex/xe^x/x and 1/log⁡x1/\log x have no antiderivative built from elementary functions.

The hypothesis on the constants cannot be dropped. Over F=ℝ(x)F = \R(x), the element α=1/(1+x2)\alpha = 1/(1 + x^2) has the antiderivative arctan⁡x=12ilog⁡x−ix+i\arctan x = \frac{1}{2i} \log \frac{x - i}{x + i}, which lies in an elementary extension that contains the new constant ii. But α\alpha has no expression of the form above with real constants and ui,v∈ℝ(x)u_i, v \in \R(x).

Going deeper

For a student

The theorem turns the question "is this integral elementary?" into an algebraic question about the field FF. For F=ℂ(x,eg)F = \C(x, e^{g}) with gg a nonconstant polynomial, it reduces to a first-order linear differential equation over ℂ(x)\C(x). This gives a classical criterion for rational ff: the integral ∫feg dx\int f e^{g} \, dx is elementary exactly when R′+g′R=fR' + g' R = f has a solution R∈ℂ(x)R \in \C(x). The Risch algorithm makes this reduction systematic and decides elementary integrability in towers of logarithms, exponentials and algebraic functions. The theorem is a basic result of differential algebra, alongside the theory of Picard–Vessiot extensions.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 5 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Antiderivative concept
  2. Derivation concept
  3. Differential field concept
  4. Field extension concept
  5. Liouville's theorem (differential algebra) statement

Where this leads

1 page builds on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liouville's_theorem_(differential_algebra)
About this page
Tag8VRTPECBPZ
URIm2://8VRTPECBPZ
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC12H05, 33F10
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status 8VRTPECBPZ.
AboutDifferential field, Antiderivative
UsesDifferential field, Derivation, Field extension, Antiderivative
Same as
Changed2 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

Used by