Math 2.0

Functional analysis Duality for topological vector spaces Theorem

Mackey–Arens theorem

Builds on Dual pairLocally convex spaceContinuous dual spaceWeak topologyMackey topology

Statement

Let 𝕂\mathbb{K} be ℝ\R or ℂ\C, let (X,Y,⟨⋅,⋅⟩)(X, Y, \langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle) be a dual pair over 𝕂\mathbb{K}, and let 𝒯\mathcal{T} be a locally convex topology on XX. Say that 𝒯\mathcal{T} is compatible with the pair if the continuous dual of (X,𝒯)(X, \mathcal{T}) is exactly the set of linear forms x↦⟨x,y⟩x \mapsto \langle x, y \rangle with y∈Yy \in Y. Then 𝒯\mathcal{T} is compatible with the pair if and only if σ(X,Y)⊆𝒯⊆τ(X,Y),\sigma(X, Y) \subseteq \mathcal{T} \subseteq \tau(X, Y), where σ(X,Y)\sigma(X, Y) is the weak topology and τ(X,Y)\tau(X, Y) is the Mackey topology.

Remarks

The weak topology is compatible by construction, and it is the coarsest topology for which all the forms ⟨⋅,y⟩\langle \cdot, y \rangle are continuous. If 𝒯\mathcal{T} is compatible, each 𝒯\mathcal{T}-neighbourhood of 00 contains a closed convex balanced neighbourhood UU of 00. Its polar U∘U^\circ in YY is convex, balanced and σ(Y,X)\sigma(Y, X)-compact by the Banach–Alaoglu theorem, and U=U∘∘U = U^{\circ\circ} by the bipolar theorem. So UU is a τ(X,Y)\tau(X, Y)-neighbourhood of 00, which gives 𝒯⊆τ(X,Y)\mathcal{T} \subseteq \tau(X, Y). That τ(X,Y)\tau(X, Y) itself is compatible is the harder half; it uses the bipolar theorem and a compactness argument in the algebraic dual of YY. Example: for a normed space EE, the weak topology σ(E,E′)\sigma(E, E') and the norm topology are both compatible with the pair (E,E′)(E, E'), so they have the same continuous linear forms. A consequence: all compatible topologies have the same closed convex sets. Indeed, by the Hahn–Banach separation theorem, a closed convex set is an intersection of closed half-spaces defined by continuous forms.

Going deeper

For a student

In duality theory one often starts from a dual pair and asks which topologies on one side give the other side as dual. The Mackey–Arens theorem answers this completely. It explains why closed convex sets and bounded sets depend only on the dual pair: they are the same for all compatible topologies. For bounded sets this is Mackey's theorem. It also shows that the Mackey topology is natural: metrizable and barrelled locally convex spaces carry their Mackey topology. The proof rests on the bipolar theorem and on Banach–Alaoglu compactness.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 6 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Continuous dual space concept
  2. Dual pair concept
  3. Locally convex space concept
  4. Mackey topology concept
  5. Weak topology concept
  6. Mackey–Arens theorem statement

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mackey–Arens_theorem
About this page
TagRKKWS7CDNF
URIm2://RKKWS7CDNF
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC46A20
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status RKKWS7CDNF.
AboutMackey topology, Weak topology, Dual pair
UsesDual pair, Locally convex space, Continuous dual space, Weak topology, Mackey topology
Same as
Changed2 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.