Math 2.0

K-theory K1 and Whitehead groups Theorem

Mayer–Vietoris sequence in K-theory

Builds on Milnor squareK0 of a ringK1 of a ringExact sequence

Statement

Let R→ f1 R1f2↓↓g1R2→ g2 R′\begin{array}{ccc} R & \xrightarrow{\ f_1\ } & R_1 \\ {\scriptstyle f_2}\downarrow & & \downarrow{\scriptstyle g_1} \\ R_2 & \xrightarrow{\ g_2\ } & R' \end{array} be a Milnor square in which g2g_2 is surjective. Then there is a homomorphism ∂ ⁣:K1(R′)→K0(R)\partial \colon K_1(R') \to K_0(R) such that the sequence K1(R)→αK1(R1)⊕K1(R2)→βK1(R′)→∂K0(R)→αK0(R1)⊕K0(R2)→βK0(R′)K_1(R) \xrightarrow{\alpha} K_1(R_1) \oplus K_1(R_2) \xrightarrow{\beta} K_1(R') \xrightarrow{\partial} K_0(R) \xrightarrow{\alpha} K_0(R_1) \oplus K_0(R_2) \xrightarrow{\beta} K_0(R') is exact, where α(x)=(f1∗x,f2∗x)\alpha(x) = (f_{1*} x, f_{2*} x) and β(y,z)=g1∗y−g2∗z\beta(y, z) = g_{1*} y - g_{2*} z, written additively, on the groups K0 and K1.

Remarks

The idea of the proof is Milnor's patching construction. Given finitely generated projective modules P1P_1 over R1R_1 and P2P_2 over R2R_2 and an isomorphism h ⁣:R′⊗P1→R′⊗P2h \colon R' \otimes P_1 \to R' \otimes P_2, the set of pairs (p1,p2)(p_1, p_2) with h(1⊗p1)=1⊗p2h(1 \otimes p_1) = 1 \otimes p_2 is a finitely generated projective RR-module. The boundary ∂\partial sends the class of a matrix h∈GLn(R′)h \in GL_n(R') to [M(h)]−[Rn][M(h)] - [R^n], where M(h)M(h) is the module patched from R1nR_1^n and R2nR_2^n along hh. Surjectivity of g2g_2 is used to lift elementary matrices from R′R' to R2R_2, which makes ∂\partial well defined on K1K_1. Example: for R=k[x,y]/(xy)R = k[x, y]/(xy) with R1=k[x]R_1 = k[x], R2=k[y]R_2 = k[y] and R′=kR' = k, all four rings have K0≅ℤK_0 \cong \Z and the sequence gives K0(R)≅ℤK_0(R) \cong \Z, since K1(k[x])⊕K1(k[y])→K1(k)=k×K_1(k[x]) \oplus K_1(k[y]) \to K_1(k) = k^\times is onto.

Going deeper

For a student

The sequence is the main tool for computing K0K_0 of non-normal rings and of group rings such as ℤ[Cp]\Z[C_p], which sit in Milnor squares with simpler rings. It continues to the left with negative K-groups, which is one way to motivate them. It does not continue to the right in general, since excision fails for K1K_1. For the square built from an ideal II common to R⊆SR \subseteq S, it is closely related to excision for K0K_0.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 5 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Exact sequence concept
  2. K0 of a ring concept
  3. K1 of a ring concept
  4. Milnor square concept
  5. Mayer–Vietoris sequence in K-theory statement

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayer%E2%80%93Vietoris_sequence
About this page
TagC2VC3YTG2P
URIm2://C2VC3YTG2P
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC19B99, 19A49
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status C2VC3YTG2P.
AboutMilnor square, K0 of a ring, K1 of a ring
UsesMilnor square, K0 of a ring, K1 of a ring, Exact sequence
Changed3 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.