Statistical mechanics, structure of matter Lattice spin systems Theorem
Mermin–Wagner theorem
Statement
Let and , and let be the unit sphere. Consider the classical lattice model on with spins and nearest-neighbour coupling . Add a field along the first unit vector , so that the energy on a finite box is The first sum runs over the neighbouring pairs in . The reference measure at each site is the uniform measure on . Let be the limit of under the Gibbs distribution on boxes growing to , at inverse temperature . Then for every , the spontaneous magnetization vanishes:
Remarks
N. David Mermin and Herbert Wagner proved the theorem in 1966 for the quantum Heisenberg model. They allowed couplings of longer range, under the condition , and the classical case follows in the same way. Their proof uses the Bogoliubov inequality to bound the squared magnetization by a constant divided by an integral over wave vectors . As this integral behaves like near , which diverges in . In words, long-wavelength spin waves cost little energy in low dimension, and at any positive temperature they destroy long-range order. The continuous symmetry is necessary: the two-dimensional Ising model, with discrete symmetry, is ordered at low temperature by the Peierls argument. The dimension is necessary: in these models have spontaneous magnetization at low temperature, by the infrared bounds of Fröhlich, Simon and Spencer. Later work showed that in every infinite-volume Gibbs measure of such models is invariant under rotations of the spins.
Going deeper
For a student
The theorem applies to the n-vector models, including the XY and classical Heisenberg models, and its versions cover superfluids and crystals. It rules out spontaneous magnetization but not every phase transition: the two-dimensional XY model has a Berezinskii–Kosterlitz–Thouless transition, where correlations change from exponential to power-law decay. Its proof is a good model of how fluctuations at long wavelengths decide whether order survives. Comparing with the Peierls argument shows the difference between discrete and continuous symmetries.
Reading path
To understand this page from the ground up, read these 5 pages in order. The foundations come first.
Show the path as a graph
- no evidence level
- Gibbs measure concept
- Ising model example
- Lattice model concept
- Peierls argument statement
- Mermin–Wagner theorem statement
Further reading
About this page
| Tag | 5C0QQFXSD7 |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://5C0QQFXSD7 |
| Kind | statement, theorem |
| Writing | W0 stub |
| MSC | 82B20, 82B26, 82D40 |
| Status | This copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status 5C0QQFXSD7. |
| About | n-vector model, Spontaneous magnetization |
| Uses | Lattice model, Gibbs measure, Peierls argument |
| Same as | |
| Changed | 3 November 2026 |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
- a source with a locator (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.