Math 2.0

Geometry Proof

Proof of Ceva's theorem by barycentric coordinates

Builds on TriangleLineCollinear pointsAffine combinationLinear independenceLinearly independent set of the right size is a basis

Proof

We use barycentric coordinates with respect to AA, BB, CC.

  1. The points AA, BB, CC of the triangle are not collinear. So the vectors B−AB - A and C−AC - A are linearly independent.
  2. Two linearly independent vectors of ℝ2\mathbb{R}^2 form a basis. So each point XX has a unique form X=A+u(B−A)+v(C−A)X = A + u(B - A) + v(C - A).
  3. Equivalently, each point XX is a unique affine combination X=αA+βB+γCX = \alpha A + \beta B + \gamma C with α+β+γ=1\alpha + \beta + \gamma = 1. We call (α,β,γ)(\alpha, \beta, \gamma) the coordinates of XX.
  4. The line BCBC is the set of the points (1−s)B+sC(1 - s)B + sC with s∈ℝs \in \mathbb{R}. By the uniqueness in step 3, a point lies on BCBC if and only if α=0\alpha = 0. In the same way, CACA is β=0\beta = 0 and ABAB is γ=0\gamma = 0.
  5. Let X=αA+βB+γCX = \alpha A + \beta B + \gamma C be a point of ABAB, so γ=0\gamma = 0 and α+β=1\alpha + \beta = 1, and let X≠BX \neq B, so α≠0\alpha \neq 0. Then X−A=β(B−A)X - A = \beta(B - A) and B−X=α(B−A)B - X = \alpha(B - A). Hence the signed ratio is AXXB=βα\frac{AX}{XB} = \frac{\beta}{\alpha}.

The direct statement.

  1. Let O=αA+βB+γCO = \alpha A + \beta B + \gamma C with α+β+γ=1\alpha + \beta + \gamma = 1. Since OO is not on BCBC, CACA, ABAB, step 4 gives α≠0\alpha \neq 0, β≠0\beta \neq 0 and γ≠0\gamma \neq 0.
  2. A point of the line AOAO has the form (1−t)A+tO=(1−t+tα)A+tβB+tγC(1 - t)A + tO = (1 - t + t\alpha)A + t\beta B + t\gamma C. Its first coordinate is 1−t(β+γ)1 - t(\beta + \gamma).
  3. If β+γ=0\beta + \gamma = 0, then this coordinate is 11 for all tt. Then by step 4 the line AOAO does not meet BCBC, against the hypothesis. So β+γ≠0\beta + \gamma \neq 0.
  4. By step 4, the point DD is the point of step 7 with t=1β+γt = \frac{1}{\beta + \gamma}. Thus D=ββ+γB+γβ+γCD = \frac{\beta}{\beta + \gamma} B + \frac{\gamma}{\beta + \gamma} C, and D≠CD \neq C since β≠0\beta \neq 0.
  5. By step 5 applied to the side BCBC, we get BDDC=γβ\frac{BD}{DC} = \frac{\gamma}{\beta}.
  6. In the same way, α+β≠0\alpha + \beta \neq 0 and γ+α≠0\gamma + \alpha \neq 0. Also F=αA+βBα+βF = \frac{\alpha A + \beta B}{\alpha + \beta} and E=γC+αAγ+αE = \frac{\gamma C + \alpha A}{\gamma + \alpha}. So AFFB=βα\frac{AF}{FB} = \frac{\beta}{\alpha} and CEEA=αγ\frac{CE}{EA} = \frac{\alpha}{\gamma}.
  7. Multiplying, AFFB⋅BDDC⋅CEEA=βα⋅γβ⋅αγ=1\frac{AF}{FB} \cdot \frac{BD}{DC} \cdot \frac{CE}{EA} = \frac{\beta}{\alpha} \cdot \frac{\gamma}{\beta} \cdot \frac{\alpha}{\gamma} = 1.

The converse.

  1. Let DD, EE, FF be as in the converse. Put x=BDDCx = \frac{BD}{DC}, y=CEEAy = \frac{CE}{EA} and z=AFFBz = \frac{AF}{FB}, so xyz=1xyz = 1.
  2. From D−B=x(C−D)D - B = x(C - D) we get (1+x)D=B+xC(1 + x)D = B + xC. If x=−1x = -1, this gives B=CB = C, which is false. So 1+x≠01 + x \neq 0. Also x≠0x \neq 0, because D≠BD \neq B.
  3. In the same way, (1+y)E=C+yA(1 + y)E = C + yA and (1+z)F=A+zB(1 + z)F = A + zB, with y,z∉{0,−1}y, z \notin \set{0, -1}.
  4. Put S=1+z+zxS = 1 + z + zx and w=A+zB+zxCw = A + zB + zxC. Using step 14, z(1+x)D=zB+zxCz(1 + x)D = zB + zxC. Hence w=A+z(1+x)Dw = A + z(1 + x)D.
  5. Using zxy=1zxy = 1 and step 15, zx(1+y)E=zxC+Azx(1 + y)E = zxC + A. Hence w=zB+zx(1+y)Ew = zB + zx(1 + y)E. Note zx(1+y)=zx+1zx(1 + y) = zx + 1.
  6. Using step 15, w=zxC+(1+z)Fw = zxC + (1 + z)F.
  7. Case S≠0S \neq 0. Put Q=w/SQ = w / S. By step 16, Q=1SA+z(1+x)SDQ = \frac{1}{S}A + \frac{z(1 + x)}{S}D, an affine combination of AA and DD since the weights add up to 11. So QQ lies on the line ADAD.
  8. By steps 17 and 18 in the same way, QQ lies on the lines BEBE and CFCF. So the three lines meet in the point QQ.
  9. Case S=0S = 0. Then w=(A+zB+zxC)−SA=z(B−A)+zx(C−A)w = (A + zB + zxC) - S A = z(B - A) + zx(C - A). This is a nonzero vector by step 1, since z≠0z \neq 0 by step 15.
  10. Since S=0S = 0, step 16 gives z(1+x)(D−A)=w−SA=wz(1 + x)(D - A) = w - SA = w. So ww is a direction vector of the line ADAD, as z(1+x)≠0z(1 + x) \neq 0.
  11. In the same way, steps 17 and 18 give (1+zx)(E−B)=w(1 + zx)(E - B) = w and (1+z)(F−C)=w(1 + z)(F - C) = w. Here 1+zx=zx(1+y)≠01 + zx = zx(1 + y) \neq 0 and 1+z≠01 + z \neq 0.
  12. So the lines ADAD, BEBE and CFCF all have the direction ww, and they are parallel.

Idea

Barycentric coordinates turn each ratio on a side into a quotient of two coordinates of the point OO. The product of the three quotients telescopes to 11. For the converse, the weights 11, zz, zxzx build the common point directly. When these weights add up to 00, the same computation gives a common direction.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 19 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proofs Proof of the Steinitz exchange lemma by induction, Proof that n independent or n spanning vectors in an n-dimensional space form a basis.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Affine combination concept
  2. Collinear points concept
  3. Line concept
  4. Linear independence concept
  5. Triangle concept
  6. Vector space definition
  7. Linear combination definition
  8. Linear subspace definition
  9. Linear independence definition
  10. Linear span definition
  11. Spanning set definition
  12. Basis definition
  13. Finite-dimensional vector space definition
  14. Proof of the Steinitz exchange lemma by induction proof
  15. Dimension definition
  16. Steinitz exchange lemma statement
  17. Proof that n independent or n spanning vectors in an n-dimensional space form a basis proof
  18. Linearly independent set of the right size is a basis statement
  19. Proof of Ceva's theorem by barycentric coordinates proof

Where this leads

1 page builds on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceva%27s_theorem, Using barycentric coordinates
About this page
Tag3DHVEJ7TKJ
URIm2://3DHVEJ7TKJ
Kindproof
WritingW0 stub
MSC51M04
ProvesCeva's theorem
UsesTriangle, Line, Collinear points, Affine combination, Linear independence, Linearly independent set of the right size is a basis
Changed4 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.