Mathematical logic and foundations Proof
Proof of the associativity of composition
Builds on Function compositionFunctionSetAxiom of extensionality
Proof
We compare the two functions at each point.
- Let , and be functions.
- By the definition of composition, and . So and are both functions from to .
- Let . By the definition of composition, applied twice, .
- Also .
- By steps 3 and 4, the two functions take the same value at each .
- A function is the set of pairs with . By step 5, both functions are the same set of pairs.
- Two sets with the same elements are equal, by the axiom of extensionality. Hence .
Idea
Both ways of grouping send to : first apply , then , then . Functions that agree at every point are equal.
Reading path
To understand this page from the ground up, read these 18 pages in order. The foundations come first.
Show the path as a graph
- no evidence level
- Element definition
- Proposition concept
- Set definition
- Conjunction definition
- Implication definition
- Predicate definition
- Ordered pair definition
- Biconditional definition
- Existential quantifier definition
- Universal quantifier definition
- Cartesian product definition
- Axiom of extensionality statement
- Subset definition
- Uniqueness quantifier definition
- Binary relation definition
- Function definition
- Function composition definition
- Proof of the associativity of composition proof
Where this leads
3 pages build on this one.
Further reading
About this page
| Tag | KC5B2GHS8R |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://KC5B2GHS8R |
| Kind | proof |
| Writing | W0 stub |
| MSC | 03E20 |
| Proves | Associativity of composition |
| Uses | Function composition, Function, Set, Axiom of extensionality |
| Changed | 4 November 2026 |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
- a source with a locator (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.