Field theory and polynomials Proof
Proof of the quadratic formula by completing the square
Proof
We complete the square and then factor a difference of two squares.
- Let with , and let satisfy . Fix .
- The complex numbers form a field. So the usual rules of algebra hold, and each nonzero number has an inverse.
- Expanding gives .
- By Step 3, .
- Since , Step 4 becomes .
- For all we have , by expanding the right side.
- By Steps 5 and 6, .
- If and , then or . Indeed, if , then .
- The number is nonzero, since and , by Step 8. Likewise .
- If , then . Conversely, if , then by Steps 8 and 9. So the two equations are equivalent.
- By Steps 7, 8 and 10, holds if and only if or .
- Since , the equation is equivalent to . We add to both sides and multiply by .
- In the same way, is equivalent to .
- By Steps 11, 12 and 13, if and only if or .
Idea
Multiplying the equation by turns its left side into the perfect square minus the discriminant. Since the discriminant is , the result is a difference of two squares, which factors into two linear factors. A product in a field is zero only when a factor is zero, so the roots are the zeros of the two linear factors.
Reading path
To understand this page from the ground up, read these 19 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proofs Proof of the equality of complex numbers, Proof that the complex numbers form a field.
Show the path as a graph
- no evidence level
- Complex numbers object
- Complex numbers as pairs of reals concept
- Element definition
- Group concept
- Imaginary unit object
- Real numbers object
- Real and imaginary parts definition
- Set definition
- Ring definition
- The reals form a field statement
- Ordered pair definition
- Commutative ring definition
- Unit of a ring definition
- Proof of the equality of complex numbers proof
- Field definition
- Equality of complex numbers statement
- Proof that the complex numbers form a field proof
- The complex numbers form a field statement
- Proof of the quadratic formula by completing the square proof
Where this leads
14 pages build on this one.
- Impossibility of doubling the cube
- Impossibility of trisecting the angle
- Quadratic formula
- The constructible numbers form a field closed under square roots
- The degree of a constructible number is a power of two
- Impossibility of squaring the circle
- Gauss–Wantzel theorem
- Proof of the impossibility of doubling the cube
- Proof of the impossibility of squaring the circle
- Proof that the constructible numbers form the smallest subfield of the complex numbers closed under square roots
- Proof that the degree of a constructible number is a power of two
- Proof of the impossibility of trisecting the angle
- Proof of the Gauss–Wantzel theorem
- Impossibility of the classical construction problems
Further reading
- Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_formula, Derivation by completing the square
About this page
| Tag | NXNBXZWFZ1 |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://NXNBXZWFZ1 |
| Kind | proof |
| Writing | W0 stub |
| MSC | 12D10 |
| Proves | Quadratic formula |
| Uses | The complex numbers form a field, Complex numbers |
| Changed | 4 November 2026 |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.