Math 2.0

Sequences, series, summability Proof

Proof of the Stolz–Cesàro theorem

Builds on Limit of a sequenceMonotone sequenceSequence tending to infinity

Proof

We sum the hypothesis over a block of indices, so that the differences telescope.

  1. Let ε>0\varepsilon > 0. By the definition of the limit of a sequence, there is a natural number N1N_1 such that ∣ak+1−akbk+1−bk−L∣<εfor all k≥N1.\left| \frac{a_{k+1} - a_k}{b_{k+1} - b_k} - L \right| < \varepsilon \quad \text{for all } k \ge N_1.
  2. Since bn→+∞b_n \to +\infty in the sense of a sequence tending to infinity, there is N2N_2 with bn>0b_n > 0 for all n≥N2n \ge N_2. Let N=max⁡(N1,N2)N = \max(N_1, N_2), so bN>0b_N > 0.
  3. Since (bn)(b_n) is strictly increasing, as a monotone sequence, we have bk+1−bk>0b_{k+1} - b_k > 0 for every kk.
  4. Multiply the inequality of step 1 by bk+1−bk>0b_{k+1} - b_k > 0. For each k≥Nk \ge N this gives (L−ε)(bk+1−bk)<ak+1−ak<(L+ε)(bk+1−bk).(L - \varepsilon)(b_{k+1} - b_k) < a_{k+1} - a_k < (L + \varepsilon)(b_{k+1} - b_k).
  5. Let n>Nn > N. Add the inequalities of step 4 for k=N,N+1,…,n−1k = N, N+1, \dots, n-1. Both sides telescope, and we get (L−ε)(bn−bN)<an−aN<(L+ε)(bn−bN).(L - \varepsilon)(b_n - b_N) < a_n - a_N < (L + \varepsilon)(b_n - b_N).
  6. Subtract L(bn−bN)L(b_n - b_N) from each part of step 5. This gives ∣an−aN−L(bn−bN)∣<ε(bn−bN)\left| a_n - a_N - L(b_n - b_N) \right| < \varepsilon (b_n - b_N).
  7. For n>Nn > N we have bn>bN>0b_n > b_N > 0, so bn≠0b_n \ne 0 and 0<bn−bN<bn0 < b_n - b_N < b_n. We can write anbn−L=aN−LbNbn+an−aN−L(bn−bN)bn.\frac{a_n}{b_n} - L = \frac{a_N - L b_N}{b_n} + \frac{a_n - a_N - L(b_n - b_N)}{b_n}.
  8. By steps 6 and 7, the second fraction in step 7 has absolute value less than ε(bn−bN)/bn<ε\varepsilon (b_n - b_N)/b_n < \varepsilon.
  9. Let c=∣aN−LbN∣c = \abs{a_N - L b_N}; it does not depend on nn. Since bn→+∞b_n \to +\infty, there is N3N_3 with bn>c/εb_n > c/\varepsilon for all n≥N3n \ge N_3. For such nn with bn>0b_n > 0, the first fraction has absolute value c/bn<εc / b_n < \varepsilon.
  10. Let n≥max⁡(N+1,N3)n \ge \max(N + 1, N_3). By the triangle inequality and steps 8 and 9, ∣an/bn−L∣<2ε\abs{a_n / b_n - L} < 2\varepsilon.
  11. Since ε>0\varepsilon > 0 was arbitrary, an/bn→La_n / b_n \to L as n→∞n \to \infty.

Idea

The hypothesis says that each step ak+1−aka_{k+1} - a_k is close to LL times the step bk+1−bkb_{k+1} - b_k. Adding many steps shows that ana_n grows like LbnL b_n, up to an error of at most εbn\varepsilon b_n and a fixed constant. Dividing by bnb_n, which tends to infinity, makes the constant negligible.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 6 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Sequence definition
  2. Real sequence definition
  3. Limit of a sequence definition
  4. Monotone sequence definition
  5. Sequence tending to infinity definition
  6. Proof of the Stolz–Cesàro theorem proof

Where this leads

1 page builds on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stolz%E2%80%93Ces%C3%A0ro_theorem, Proof of the theorem for the */∞ case
About this page
TagPD8A380ZF1
URIm2://PD8A380ZF1
Kindproof
WritingW0 stub
MSC40A05
ProvesStolz–Cesàro theorem
UsesLimit of a sequence, Monotone sequence, Sequence tending to infinity
Changed4 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.