Math 2.0

statement theorem

Stolz–Cesàro theorem

Statement

Let (an)(a_n) and (bn)(b_n) be real sequences and let LL be a real number. Assume that (bn)(b_n) is strictly increasing and that bn→+∞b_n \to +\infty as n→∞n \to \infty. Assume that lim⁡n→∞an+1−anbn+1−bn=L.\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{a_{n+1} - a_n}{b_{n+1} - b_n} = L. Then an/bn→La_n / b_n \to L as n→∞n \to \infty.

Remarks

There is also a 0/00/0 form. If an→0a_n \to 0, bn→0b_n \to 0, (bn)(b_n) is strictly decreasing and the quotient of the differences tends to LL, then an/bn→La_n / b_n \to L. With bn=nb_n = n it gives the convergence of the Cesàro means. For example, with an=1+2+⋯+na_n = 1 + 2 + \cdots + n and bn=n2b_n = n^2, the quotient of differences is (n+1)/(2n+1)→1/2(n+1)/(2n+1) \to 1/2, so an/n2→1/2a_n / n^2 \to 1/2. It is a discrete analogue of L'Hôpital's rule.

History

Otto Stolz proved the ∞/∞\infty/\infty case in a book of 1885. Ernesto Cesàro gave it in an article of 1888.

Explanations

L1 human

To compare two sequences that grow without bound, it is enough to compare their steps. If each step of ana_n is about LL times the step of bnb_n, then ana_n is about LL times bnb_n in the long run.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 6 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Sequence definition
  2. Real sequence definition
  3. Limit of a sequence definition
  4. Monotone sequence definition
  5. Sequence tending to infinity definition
  6. Stolz–Cesàro theorem statement

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stolz–Cesàro_theorem, Statement of the theorem for the */∞ case