Math 2.0

Combinatorics Proof

Proof of Vandermonde's identity by induction

Builds on Binomial coefficientPascal's rule

Proof

We argue by induction on nn. The claim for nn is that the identity holds for this nn, every natural number mm and every natural number rr.

  1. Let n=0n = 0. By the definition of the binomial coefficient, (00)=1\binom{0}{0} = 1 and (0j)=0\binom{0}{j} = 0 for j≥1j \ge 1.
  2. So in ∑k=0r(mk)(0r−k)\sum_{k=0}^{r} \binom{m}{k} \binom{0}{r-k} only the term k=rk = r is nonzero. The sum equals (mr)=(m+0r)\binom{m}{r} = \binom{m+0}{r}.
  3. Suppose the claim holds for nn. Fix mm and rr. We prove (m+n+1r)=∑k=0r(mk)(n+1r−k)\binom{m+n+1}{r} = \sum_{k=0}^{r} \binom{m}{k} \binom{n+1}{r-k}.
  4. If r=0r = 0, both sides equal 11, because (a0)=1\binom{a}{0} = 1 for every aa.
  5. Otherwise r=s+1r = s + 1 for a natural number ss. By Pascal's rule, (m+n+1s+1)=(m+ns)+(m+ns+1)\binom{m+n+1}{s+1} = \binom{m+n}{s} + \binom{m+n}{s+1}.
  6. By the induction hypothesis for nn, with r=sr = s and with r=s+1r = s + 1, the left side is L1+L2L_1 + L_2. Here L1=∑k=0s(mk)(ns−k)L_1 = \sum_{k=0}^{s} \binom{m}{k} \binom{n}{s-k} and L2=∑k=0s+1(mk)(ns+1−k)L_2 = \sum_{k=0}^{s+1} \binom{m}{k} \binom{n}{s+1-k}.
  7. In the right side ∑k=0s+1(mk)(n+1s+1−k)\sum_{k=0}^{s+1} \binom{m}{k} \binom{n+1}{s+1-k}, the term k=s+1k = s + 1 is (ms+1)(n+10)=(ms+1)(n0)\binom{m}{s+1} \binom{n+1}{0} = \binom{m}{s+1} \binom{n}{0}, since both coefficients (⋅0)\binom{\cdot}{0} equal 11.
  8. For k≤sk \le s, write s+1−k=(s−k)+1s + 1 - k = (s - k) + 1. Pascal's rule gives (n+1s+1−k)=(ns−k)+(ns+1−k)\binom{n+1}{s+1-k} = \binom{n}{s-k} + \binom{n}{s+1-k}.
  9. So the right side equals ∑k=0s(mk)(ns−k)+∑k=0s(mk)(ns+1−k)+(ms+1)(n0)\sum_{k=0}^{s} \binom{m}{k} \binom{n}{s-k} + \sum_{k=0}^{s} \binom{m}{k} \binom{n}{s+1-k} + \binom{m}{s+1} \binom{n}{0}.
  10. The first sum is L1L_1. The last two parts together are L2L_2, whose term k=s+1k = s + 1 is (ms+1)(n0)\binom{m}{s+1} \binom{n}{0}.
  11. Hence the right side equals L1+L2L_1 + L_2, which is the left side by step 6. This completes the induction.

Idea

Pascal's rule splits every binomial coefficient with top entry n+1n + 1 into two with top entry nn. Applying it on both sides reduces the identity for n+1n + 1 to two instances of the identity for nn. The induction hypothesis must cover all rr, because the step uses it for r−1r - 1 and for rr.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 4 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proof Proof of Pascal's rule from the recursive definition.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Binomial coefficient definition
  2. Proof of Pascal's rule from the recursive definition proof
  3. Pascal's rule statement
  4. Proof of Vandermonde's identity by induction proof

Where this leads

1 page builds on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://courses.csail.mit.edu/6.042/past-devel/archive/spring00/archive/lectures/L16.pdf, Theorem 1.7
About this page
TagFF47MSWNER
URIm2://FF47MSWNER
Kindproof
WritingW0 stub
MSC05A19
ProvesVandermonde's identity
UsesBinomial coefficient, Pascal's rule
MethodsMathematical induction
Changed4 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.