Math 2.0

statement theorem

Second supplement to quadratic reciprocity

Statement

Let pp be an odd prime. Then (2p)=(−1)(p2−1)/8,\left(\frac{2}{p}\right) = (-1)^{(p^2-1)/8}, where the left side is a Legendre symbol.

Remarks

So 22 is a quadratic residue modulo pp if p≡±1(mod8)p \equiv \pm 1 \pmod 8, and a nonresidue if p≡±3(mod8)p \equiv \pm 3 \pmod 8. For example, 32≡2(mod7)3^2 \equiv 2 \pmod 7, but 22 is not a square modulo 55. One proof uses Gauss's lemma with a=2a = 2.

History

Euler proved the second supplement.

Explanations

L1 human

Whether 22 is a square modulo pp depends only on the remainder of pp on division by 88. The remainders 11 and 77 give a square, and the remainders 33 and 55 do not.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 6 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Divisibility definition
  2. Congruence modulo n definition
  3. Prime number definition
  4. Quadratic residue definition
  5. Legendre symbol definition
  6. Second supplement to quadratic reciprocity statement

What depends on this

2 nodes use this node, directly or through other nodes.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadratic_reciprocity, q = ±2 and the second supplement