Math 2.0

Number theory Arithmetic geometry Theorem

Serre's modularity conjecture

Builds on Galois representationModular formCusp formHecke operatorFrobenius elementFinite field

Statement

Let pp be a prime, and let 𝔽‾p\overline{\F}_p be an algebraic closure of the finite field 𝔽p\F_p. Let ρˉ ⁣:Gal⁡(ℚ‾/ℚ)→GL2(𝔽‾p)\bar\rho \colon \Gal(\overline{\Q}/\Q) \to \mathrm{GL}_2(\overline{\F}_p) be a continuous Galois representation that is irreducible and odd, that is, det⁡ρˉ(c)=−1\det \bar\rho(c) = -1 for a complex conjugation cc. Then ρˉ\bar\rho is modular, in the following sense. There is a normalised cusp form f=∑n≥1anqnf = \sum_{n \ge 1} a_n q^n of some weight k≥2k \ge 2 and level N≥1N \ge 1 that is an eigenform of all Hecke operators. Let Frobℓ\mathrm{Frob}_\ell denote a Frobenius element at a prime ℓ\ell. There is also a ring homomorphism a↦aˉa \mapsto \bar{a} from the ring generated by the ana_n to 𝔽‾p\overline{\F}_p such that, for every prime ℓ∤pN\ell \nmid pN, tr⁡ρˉ(Frobℓ)=aˉℓ.\tr \bar\rho(\mathrm{Frob}_\ell) = \bar{a}_\ell.

Remarks

Serre stated the conjecture in 1987 in a strong form. In it, NN is the Artin conductor of ρˉ\bar\rho away from pp, and kk is an explicit weight k(ρˉ)k(\bar\rho) read off from the restriction of ρˉ\bar\rho to inertia at pp. Ribet's level-lowering theorem and later work showed that the weak form above implies the strong form. Khare and Wintenberger proved the conjecture, with a step by Kisin, in work published in 2009. Their proof is an induction on the prime pp and the conductor, using modularity lifting theorems and the existence of compatible families of Galois representations. Oddness is necessary: for every modular eigenform the attached representation is odd. Example: for an elliptic curve EE over ℚ\Q, the action on the pp-torsion points E[p]E[p] gives an odd ρˉ\bar\rho, since det⁡ρˉ\det \bar\rho is the cyclotomic character modulo pp. When this ρˉ\bar\rho is irreducible, its modularity also follows from the modularity theorem.

Going deeper

For a student

The strong form gives a route to Fermat's Last Theorem. A putative solution would give a representation of level 22 and weight 22, and there are no nonzero cusp forms of that level and weight. The theorem is a mod pp case of the Langlands program for GL2\mathrm{GL}_2 over ℚ\Q. It also implies that the Artin conjecture holds for odd two-dimensional complex Galois representations of ℚ\Q.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 7 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Cusp form concept
  2. Finite field concept
  3. Frobenius element concept
  4. Galois representation concept
  5. Hecke operator concept
  6. Modular form concept
  7. Serre's modularity conjecture statement

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serre%27s_modularity_conjecture
About this page
TagRWXXNZNQYJ
URIm2://RWXXNZNQYJ
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC11F80, 11F11, 11F33
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status RWXXNZNQYJ.
AboutGalois representation, Modular form
UsesGalois representation, Modular form, Cusp form, Hecke operator, Frobenius element, Finite field
Same as
Changed2 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.