Math 2.0

K-theory Higher algebraic K-theory Theorem

Suslin rigidity theorem

Builds on K-theory with finite coefficientsFieldAlgebraic closureK-theory of finite fieldsAlgebraic K-theory

Statement

Let k⊆Lk \subseteq L be an extension of algebraically closed fields, and let ℓ≥2\ell \ge 2 be an integer that is invertible in kk. Then for every n≥0n \ge 0 the map Kn(k;ℤ/ℓ)→Kn(L;ℤ/ℓ)K_n(k; \Z/\ell) \to K_n(L; \Z/\ell) of K-groups with coefficients in ℤ/ℓ\Z/\ell is an isomorphism.

Remarks

The idea of the proof starts with a smooth curve CC over kk and two kk-points x,yx, y of CC. The two specialization maps from the mod ℓ\ell K-theory of CC to that of kk agree, because the relevant part of the Picard group of CC is ℓ\ell-divisible. The field LL is a union of finitely generated kk-algebras, each of which has kk-points. Specialization at such points shows that the map is injective, and a further use of the same rigidity property shows that it is surjective.

At work: let k=𝔽‾pk = \overline{\F}_p and ℓ\ell prime to pp. Passing to the colimit in Quillen's computation for finite fields gives Kn(𝔽‾p;ℤ/ℓ)≅ℤ/ℓK_n(\overline{\F}_p; \Z/\ell) \cong \Z/\ell for even n≥0n \ge 0 and 00 for odd nn. By the theorem, the same holds for every algebraically closed field of characteristic pp. Suslin also showed that the same answer holds in characteristic 00, where it agrees with the mod ℓ\ell homotopy of the space ℤ×BU\Z \times BU of topological K-theory.

The hypothesis that both fields are algebraically closed is necessary. For ℚ⊆ℂ\Q \subseteq \C and ℓ=2\ell = 2, K1(ℚ;ℤ/2)=ℚ×/(ℚ×)2K_1(\Q; \Z/2) = \Q^\times/(\Q^\times)^2 is infinite, while K1(ℂ;ℤ/2)=0K_1(\C; \Z/2) = 0 because every complex number is a square. The coefficients are also needed: K1(ℚ‾)=ℚ‾×→ℂ×=K1(ℂ)K_1(\overline{\Q}) = \overline{\Q}^\times \to \C^\times = K_1(\C) is not surjective, since ℚ‾\overline{\Q} is countable.

Going deeper

For a student

Rigidity is what makes mod ℓ\ell K-theory computable: it reduces algebraically closed fields to the algebraic closure of the prime field. It is the basis for comparing algebraic K-theory with étale cohomology and topological K-theory. Gabber's rigidity theorem extends the idea from field extensions to Henselian local rings and their residue fields.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 16 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Algebraic K-theory concept
  2. Algebraic closure concept
  3. Classifying space of a group concept
  4. Cyclic group concept
  5. Field concept
  6. Finite field concept
  7. General linear group object
  8. Geometric realization concept
  9. Group homology concept
  10. K-theory with finite coefficients concept
  11. Nerve of a category concept
  12. Plus construction concept
  13. Stable general linear group concept
  14. Classifying space BGL object
  15. K-theory of finite fields statement
  16. Suslin rigidity theorem statement

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rigidity_(K-theory)
About this page
TagZ2Z2WAQJJN
URIm2://Z2Z2WAQJJN
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC19D50, 19E20
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status Z2Z2WAQJJN.
AboutK-theory with finite coefficients
UsesK-theory with finite coefficients, Field, Algebraic closure, K-theory of finite fields, Algebraic K-theory
Changed3 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.