Math 2.0

statement proposition

Transpose of a product

Statement

Let RR be a commutative ring. Let AA be an m×nm \times n matrix and BB an n×pn \times p matrix over RR. Then (AB)T=BTAT(AB)^T = B^T A^T, where T^T denotes the transpose.

Remarks

The order of the factors reverses. The proof compares entries: both sides have entry (k,i)(k, i) equal to ∑jaijbjk\sum_{j} a_{ij} b_{jk}. By induction, (A1A2⋯Ak)T=AkT⋯A2TA1T(A_1 A_2 \cdots A_k)^T = A_k^T \cdots A_2^T A_1^T. If RR is not commutative, the identity can fail.

Explanations

L1 human

The transpose of a product is the product of the transposes in the reverse order. This is like taking off socks and shoes: the last thing put on comes off first. The sizes also force this order, because BTB^T is p×np \times n and ATA^T is n×mn \times m.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 4 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Matrix definition
  2. Matrix multiplication definition
  3. Transpose definition
  4. Transpose of a product statement

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transpose, Properties