Math 2.0

Optics, electromagnetic theory Definition

Uniform theory of diffraction

Builds on Keller's geometrical theory of diffractionFresnel integralsElectromagnetic scattering

Definition

Consider time-harmonic scattering of a wave of wave number kk by a perfectly conducting body with edges. Assume that kL≫1k L \gg 1 for every length LL of the geometry. Use the time factor ejωte^{j\omega t} of the engineering literature. The uniform theory of diffraction approximates the total field at a point PP by the sum of these ray contributions:

  1. the incident and reflected fields of geometrical optics, each present only where its ray reaches PP;
  2. the diffracted fields. Let a diffracted ray from an edge point QQ reach PP at distance ss. It contributes Ed(P)=Ei(Q)⋅𝐃 ρs(ρ+s) e−jks,E^d(P) = E^i(Q) \cdot \mathbf{D} \, \sqrt{\frac{\rho}{s (\rho + s)}} \, e^{-j k s}, where ρ\rho is the caustic distance of the diffracted ray and 𝐃\mathbf{D} is a dyadic diffraction coefficient.

The coefficients 𝐃\mathbf{D} are those of Keller's geometrical theory of diffraction, with one change. Each term that is singular at a shadow or reflection boundary is multiplied by a transition function. That function is F(X)=2jX ejX∫X∞e−jτ2 dτ,X>0,F(X) = 2 j \sqrt{X} \, e^{j X} \int_{\sqrt{X}}^{\infty} e^{-j \tau^2} \, d\tau, \qquad X > 0, and its argument XX tends to 00 at that boundary.

Remarks

FF is a complementary Fresnel integral times an elementary factor. For large XX, away from the boundaries, F(X)→1F(X) \to 1, and the diffracted field reduces to that of Keller's theory. Near a boundary the product of FF with the singular coefficient stays bounded, and its jump cancels the jump of the geometrical-optics field, so the total field is continuous.

Example: take a straight edge of a perfectly conducting wedge. The dyadic coefficient splits into scalar soft and hard coefficients, each a sum of four cotangent terms, and each term carries its own transition function.

Non-example: Keller's original wedge coefficients, without the factor FF, give a diffracted field that is infinite on the shadow boundary, so they do not form a uniform method.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 12 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Calculus of variations concept
  2. Electromagnetic scattering concept
  3. Euler–Lagrange equation concept
  4. Fresnel integrals concept
  5. Geodesic concept
  6. Geometric optics concept
  7. Helmholtz equation concept
  8. Wiener–Hopf method concept
  9. Fermat's principle statement
  10. Sommerfeld's half-plane diffraction problem problem
  11. Keller's geometrical theory of diffraction concept
  12. Uniform theory of diffraction definition

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_theory_of_diffraction
About this page
TagPCAD8XCAS4
URIm2://PCAD8XCAS4
Kinddefinition
WritingW0 stub
MSC78A45, 78M35
DefinesUniform theory of diffraction
UsesKeller's geometrical theory of diffraction, Fresnel integrals, Electromagnetic scattering
Changed3 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.