Math 2.0

Mechanics of deformable solids Homogenization and composites Theorem

Voigt and Reuss bounds

Builds on HomogenizationElasticity tensorStrain tensor

Statement

Let Y=[0,1)3Y = [0,1)^3 be the unit cell, and let C(y)C(y) be a YY-periodic, measurable field of elasticity tensors with the usual symmetries. Assume that CC is uniformly bounded and uniformly positive definite on symmetric matrices. Write ⟨g⟩=∫Yg dy\langle g \rangle = \int_Y g \, dy for the average over the cell. Let C∗C^* be the homogenized elasticity tensor. For every symmetric 3×33 \times 3 matrix EE it satisfies E:C∗:E=min⁡w⟨(E+e(w)):C:(E+e(w))⟩,E : C^* : E = \min_{w} \left\langle (E + e(w)) : C : (E + e(w)) \right\rangle, where ww runs over YY-periodic H1H^1 displacement fields and e(w)e(w) is the symmetric part of ∇w\nabla w. Then, in the sense of quadratic forms on symmetric matrices, ⟨C−1⟩−1≤C∗≤⟨C⟩.\langle C^{-1} \rangle^{-1} \le C^* \le \langle C \rangle. If the composite consists of nn phases with constant tensors C1,…,CnC_1, \dots, C_n and volume fractions f1,…,fnf_1, \dots, f_n, this reads (∑i=1nfiCi−1)−1≤C∗≤∑i=1nfiCi.\Big( \sum_{i=1}^n f_i C_i^{-1} \Big)^{-1} \le C^* \le \sum_{i=1}^n f_i C_i.

Remarks

The upper (Voigt) bound follows by inserting the trial field w=0w = 0, that is a uniform strain EE, into the minimum principle. The lower (Reuss) bound follows in the same way from the dual principle of minimum complementary energy, with a uniform stress as trial field. The same argument bounds the effective conductivity σ∗\sigma^* of a composite of phases with conductivities σi\sigma_i and volume fractions fif_i. It gives (∑ifi/σi)−1≤σ∗≤∑ifiσi\big(\sum_i f_i / \sigma_i\big)^{-1} \le \sigma^* \le \sum_i f_i \sigma_i. For conductivity the upper bound is attained by a laminate in the direction along the layers and the lower bound in the direction across them. So these bounds cannot be improved without more information on the geometry. Model a fibre composite in one dimension as springs in parallel or in series, with Young's moduli EfE_f, EmE_m and fibre fraction ff. The same averages then give the rule of mixtures fEf+(1−f)Emf E_f + (1-f) E_m and the inverse rule (f/Ef+(1−f)/Em)−1(f/E_f + (1-f)/E_m)^{-1}.

Going deeper

For a student

These bounds are the first step in the theory of bounds on effective properties. They use only the volume fractions, which is why they are far apart when the phases differ a lot. Adding the information that the composite is isotropic gives the much sharper Hashin–Shtrikman bounds. The proof is a direct use of the variational characterization of the homogenized tensor from homogenization.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 4 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Elasticity tensor concept
  2. Homogenization concept
  3. Strain tensor concept
  4. Voigt and Reuss bounds statement

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_mixtures
About this page
TagY7WKXDD9SJ
URIm2://Y7WKXDD9SJ
Kindstatement, theorem
WritingW0 stub
MSC74Q20, 74E30, 74Q05
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status Y7WKXDD9SJ.
AboutHomogenization, Elasticity tensor
UsesHomogenization, Elasticity tensor, Strain tensor
Changed3 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.