Math 2.0

definition

Well-founded relation

Definition

Let RR be a binary relation on a set AA. The relation RR is well-founded when each nonempty subset SS of AA has an element mm such that no s∈Ss \in S satisfies sRms \mathrel{R} m.

Remarks

The relation << on N\mathbb{N} is well-founded. The relation << on Z\mathbb{Z} is not, because Z\mathbb{Z} itself has no minimal element. If RR is well-founded, there is no sequence x0,x1,x2,…x_0, x_1, x_2, \dots with xn+1Rxnx_{n+1} \mathrel{R} x_n for each nn. The converse needs the axiom of dependent choice. Well-founded relations allow proofs by transfinite induction.

Explanations

L1 human

In a well-founded relation, you cannot go down forever. Each strictly decreasing sequence of natural numbers stops after finitely many steps.

What this node needs for W2
  • edge instance_of in: one example (0 of 1)
  • edge not_instance_of in: one non-example that fails one clause (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What depends on this

1 node uses this node, directly or through other nodes.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Well-founded_relation, lead section