Math 2.0

statement theorem

Brooks' theorem

Statement

Let GG be a finite connected simple graph with maximum degree Δ\Delta. Suppose that GG is not a complete graph and not a cycle graph of odd length. Then χ(G)≤Δ\chi(G) \le \Delta.

Remarks

A greedy colouring gives χ(G)≤Δ+1\chi(G) \le \Delta + 1 for every graph. Brooks' theorem improves this bound by 11 in all other cases. The two exceptions need Δ+1\Delta + 1 colours: χ(Kn)=n\chi(K_n) = n with Δ=n−1\Delta = n - 1, and an odd cycle has χ=3\chi = 3 with Δ=2\Delta = 2.

History

R. Leonard Brooks published the theorem in 1941.

Explanations

L1 human

If each vertex has at most Δ\Delta neighbours, then Δ+1\Delta + 1 colours are always enough. Brooks' theorem says that Δ\Delta colours are enough, except for complete graphs and odd cycles.

What this node needs for W2
  • edge about out: the concepts that the statement is about (0 of 1)
  • edge proves in: at least one proof node (0 of 1)
  • edge instance_of or illustrates in: one example that shows the statement at work (0 of 1)
  • explanation L2 (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 8 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Graph definition
  2. Graph colouring definition
  3. Neighbourhood definition
  4. K-colourable graph definition
  5. Degree of a vertex definition
  6. Chromatic number definition
  7. Maximum degree definition
  8. Brooks' theorem statement

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brooks'_theorem, Formal statement