Math 2.0

statement theorem

Characterization of bridges

Statement

Let GG be a graph and let ee be an edge of GG. Then ee is a bridge of GG if and only if ee is not an edge of any cycle of GG.

Remarks

Proof idea: let e=uve = uv. If ee lies on a cycle, the rest of the cycle is a path from uu to vv in G−eG - e. Conversely, a path from uu to vv in G−eG - e together with ee gives a cycle. A consequence: a graph is a forest if and only if every edge is a bridge.

Explanations

L1 human

An edge on a cycle is never a bridge: if you delete it, you can still go around the other way. An edge on no cycle has no detour, so deleting it splits the graph.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 9 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Graph definition
  2. Walk definition
  3. Reachability definition
  4. Trail definition
  5. Connected component definition
  6. Circuit definition
  7. Bridge definition
  8. Cycle definition
  9. Characterization of bridges statement

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bridge_(graph_theory), lead section