statement theorem
Compactness and sequential compactness agree in metric spaces
Statement
Let be a metric space and let . Then is compact if and only if is sequentially compact.
Remarks
One proof of the hard direction uses the Lebesgue number lemma and the fact that a sequentially compact metric space is totally bounded. Both conditions are also equivalent to: is complete and totally bounded. This is the statement compact iff complete and totally bounded. Without a metric, the two notions differ. For example, the product is compact but not sequentially compact.
Explanations
L1 human
In a metric space, you can test compactness with sequences. A set is compact exactly when each sequence in it has a subsequence with a limit in the set. This test is often easier than the test with open covers.
What this node needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.
What depends on this
4 nodes use this node, directly or through other nodes.
- Arzelà–Ascoli theorem 0381S8Z5P0
- Compact iff complete and totally bounded 054Q5PW5GX
- Heine–Cantor theorem 06B8BNJCD6
- Compact closed unit ball implies finite dimension 0VZVV8VME5
Sources
- Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_space, Metric spaces
- Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequentially_compact_space, Examples and properties
What links here
Used by
- Compact iff complete and totally bounded 054Q5PW5GX
- Heine–Cantor theorem 06B8BNJCD6
- Compact closed unit ball implies finite dimension 0VZVV8VME5