Math 2.0

statement theorem

Contrapositive

Statement

Let pp and qq be propositions. The implication p→qp \to q is logically equivalent to its contrapositive ¬q→¬p\neg q \to \neg p. p→q≡¬q→¬pp \to q \equiv \neg q \to \neg p

Remarks

The direction from p→qp \to q to ¬q→¬p\neg q \to \neg p is valid in intuitionistic logic. The other direction needs classical logic. This equivalence is the basis of proof by contrapositive. Do not confuse the contrapositive with the converse q→pq \to p.

Explanations

L1 human

"If it rains, the street is wet" says the same as "if the street is not wet, it does not rain". Both sentences are false in exactly one case: rain and a dry street.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 11 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Proposition concept
  2. Conjunction definition
  3. Disjunction definition
  4. Implication definition
  5. Negation definition
  6. Biconditional definition
  7. Truth table concept
  8. Propositional logic concept
  9. Tautology definition
  10. Logical equivalence definition
  11. Contrapositive statement

What depends on this

1 node uses this node, directly or through other nodes.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contraposition, lead section