Math 2.0

statement theorem

De Morgan's laws

Statement

For all propositions pp and qq, these two logical equivalences hold. ¬(p∨q)≡¬p∧¬q\neg (p \lor q) \equiv \neg p \land \neg q ¬(p∧q)≡¬p∨¬q\neg (p \land q) \equiv \neg p \lor \neg q

Remarks

The first law is also valid in intuitionistic logic. In the second law, only the direction from ¬p∨¬q\neg p \lor \neg q to ¬(p∧q)\neg (p \land q) is. The laws for sets have the same form. See De Morgan's laws for sets. The negation of a universal statement is the analogue for quantifiers.

Explanations

L1 human

To negate "and", change it to "or" and negate each part. "nn is not both even and prime" means "nn is not even, or nn is not prime". A truth table with four rows proves each law.

What this node needs for W2
  • edge about out: the concepts that the statement is about (0 of 1)
  • edge proves in: at least one proof node (0 of 1)
  • edge instance_of or illustrates in: one example that shows the statement at work (0 of 1)
  • explanation L2 (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 11 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Proposition concept
  2. Conjunction definition
  3. Disjunction definition
  4. Implication definition
  5. Negation definition
  6. Biconditional definition
  7. Truth table concept
  8. Propositional logic concept
  9. Tautology definition
  10. Logical equivalence definition
  11. De Morgan's laws statement

What depends on this

6 nodes use this node, directly or through other nodes.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Morgan's_laws, lead section