Function for which the iterated integrals differ
Counterexample
One could guess that the two iterated integrals of a function over a square are always equal when both exist. This is false. Let on . Then
Remarks
For fixed , . So the inner integral is , and its integral over is . Since , the other order gives . The function is not integrable on the square: . So Fubini's theorem does not apply. A discrete example is if , if , and otherwise, on the positive integers. The two iterated sums are and .
Explanations
L1 human
Near the corner the function has large positive values and large negative values. The two orders of integration cancel these parts in different ways, so they give different answers.
What this node needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
- edge refutes or not_instance_of out (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.
What this needs
To read this node, read these 9 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.
- no evidence level
- Euclidean space object
- Function concept
- Function of several variables concept
- Iterated integral definition
- Limit of a function of several variables concept
- Continuity in R^n definition
- Double integral definition
- Fubini's theorem statement
- Function for which the iterated integrals differ counterexample
Sources
- Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fubini%27s_theorem, Failure of Fubini's theorem for non-integrable functions
- Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iterated_integral, Lack of commutativity
What links here
No node links to this node yet.