Math 2.0

statement proposition

Generalized Euclid's lemma

Statement

Let nn, aa and bb be integers. If n∣abn \mid a b and nn and aa are coprime, then n∣bn \mid b.

Remarks

When nn is a prime pp and p∤ap \nmid a, then pp and aa are coprime. So this result implies Euclid's lemma. The proof uses Bézout's identity: from nx+ay=1n x + a y = 1 we get b=nbx+abyb = n b x + a b y, and nn divides both terms. For example, 5∣3⋅105 \mid 3 \cdot 10 and gcd⁡(5,3)=1\gcd(5, 3) = 1, so 5∣105 \mid 10.

Explanations

L1 human

If nn divides aba b but has no common factor with aa, then all the factors of nn must come from bb. For example, 4∣3b4 \mid 3 b forces 4∣b4 \mid b, because 33 gives no factor 22.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 4 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Divisibility definition
  2. Greatest common divisor definition
  3. Coprime integers definition
  4. Generalized Euclid's lemma statement

What depends on this

1 node uses this node, directly or through other nodes.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclid%27s_lemma, Formulations