Math 2.0

statement lemma

Euclid's lemma

Statement

Let pp be a prime number, and let aa and bb be integers. If p∣abp \mid a b, then p∣ap \mid a or p∣bp \mid b.

Remarks

The hypothesis that pp is prime is necessary. For example, 6∣4⋅96 \mid 4 \cdot 9, but 6∤46 \nmid 4 and 6∤96 \nmid 9. A short proof uses Bézout's identity. If p∤ap \nmid a, then gcd⁡(p,a)=1\gcd(p, a) = 1, so px+ay=1p x + a y = 1 for some integers xx and yy. Multiply by bb to see that p∣bp \mid b. The generalized Euclid's lemma replaces the prime pp by an integer that is coprime to aa. The lemma is the main step in the proof of the uniqueness part of the fundamental theorem of arithmetic.

History

The lemma is Proposition 30 of Book VII of the Elements of Euclid.

Explanations

L1 human

A prime cannot be split into smaller factors, so it cannot share itself between aa and bb. If 77 divides a product aba b, then 77 already divides aa or bb. For example, 7∣14⋅37 \mid 14 \cdot 3 and 7∣147 \mid 14.

What this node needs for W2
  • edge about out: the concepts that the statement is about (0 of 1)
  • edge proves in: at least one proof node (0 of 1)
  • edge instance_of or illustrates in: one example that shows the statement at work (0 of 1)
  • explanation L2 (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 3 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Divisibility definition
  2. Prime number definition
  3. Euclid's lemma statement

What depends on this

3 nodes use this node, directly or through other nodes.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclid%27s_lemma, Formulations