Relativity and gravitational theory Black holes Proposition
Penrose process
Builds on Kerr metricErgosphereKilling vector fieldEvent horizon
Statement
Use geometric units . Let be the Kerr metric of mass and angular momentum with . Let and be its Killing vector fields in Boyer–Lindquist coordinates. For a particle with future-directed causal four-momentum , its conserved energy is and its conserved angular momentum is . Let with be the angular velocity of the event horizon.
- At each point of the ergosphere there are future-directed timelike four-momenta with .
- Suppose a particle of momentum inside the ergosphere splits into two particles, , with . Then the energy of the first particle exceeds .
- If the second particle crosses the event horizon, then . So : the second particle carries angular momentum against the rotation of the hole. The changes and of the black hole satisfy .
Remarks
Part 1 holds because is spacelike in the ergosphere, so the timelike cone contains vectors with . Part 2 is conservation of , which follows from conservation of four-momentum and the fact that is linear in . For part 3, the vector field is a future-directed null normal of the horizon, and for any future-directed causal .
The inequality is equivalent to the statement that the irreducible mass does not decrease, where is the horizon area. Hence at most can be extracted. For an extremal black hole, , one has , so at most about of the mass can be extracted. For the Schwarzschild metric () the ergosphere is empty and the process is impossible.
Going deeper
For a student
The Penrose process shows that the mass of a rotating black hole is not all locked away. The bound says, in this simple setting, that the area of the horizon cannot decrease, which the Hawking area theorem later proved in general. It leads to the split of the mass into an irreducible part and a rotational part, and to the laws of black hole mechanics. The wave analogue of the process is superradiance, in which waves scattered by a rotating black hole come back amplified.
Reading path
To understand this page from the ground up, read these 8 pages in order. The foundations come first.
Show the path as a graph
- no evidence level
- Boyer–Lindquist coordinates concept
- Ergosphere concept
- Event horizon concept
- Killing vector field concept
- Ricci curvature concept
- Schwarzschild metric example
- Kerr metric example
- Penrose process statement
Further reading
About this page
| Tag | TW2587J15Z |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://TW2587J15Z |
| Kind | statement, proposition |
| Writing | W0 stub |
| MSC | 83C57, 83C40 |
| Status | This copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status TW2587J15Z. |
| About | Ergosphere, Kerr metric |
| Uses | Kerr metric, Ergosphere, Killing vector field, Event horizon |
| Same as | |
| Changed | 3 November 2026 |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
- a source with a locator (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.