Math 2.0

statement proposition

Polarisation identity

Statement

Let VV be an inner product space with the induced norm ∥⋅∥\norm{\cdot}, and let x,y∈Vx, y \in V. If VV is a real space, then ⟨x,y⟩=14(∥x+y∥2−∥x−y∥2).\langle x, y \rangle = \frac{1}{4} \left( \norm{x + y}^2 - \norm{x - y}^2 \right). If VV is a complex space, with the inner product linear in the first argument, then ⟨x,y⟩=14∑k=03ik∥x+iky∥2.\langle x, y \rangle = \frac{1}{4} \sum_{k=0}^{3} i^k \norm{x + i^k y}^2.

Remarks

So the norm determines the inner product. In particular, a linear map that keeps norms also keeps inner products. With the convention of linearity in the second argument, the factor iki^k moves to the other vector, and the complex formula changes accordingly.

Explanations

L1 human

If we know the lengths of all vectors, then we also know all inner products. In the real case, we only need the lengths of the two diagonals x+yx + y and x−yx - y. So lengths determine angles.

What this node needs for W2
  • edge about out: the concepts that the statement is about (0 of 1)
  • edge proves in: at least one proof node (0 of 1)
  • edge instance_of or illustrates in: one example that shows the statement at work (0 of 1)
  • explanation L2 (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 6 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Vector space definition
  2. Inner product definition
  3. Norm definition
  4. Inner product space definition
  5. Norm induced by an inner product definition
  6. Polarisation identity statement

What depends on this

1 node uses this node, directly or through other nodes.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polarization_identity, Polarization identities