Math 2.0

Mathematical logic and foundations Proof

Proof of the distributive laws for sets

Builds on SetAxiom of extensionalityUnionIntersectionLaw of excluded middle

Proof

We show that each side has the same elements as the other. Two sets with the same elements are equal, by the axiom of extensionality. Let AA, BB and CC be sets.

  1. Let x∈A∩(B∪C)x \in A \cap (B \cup C). By the definition of intersection, x∈Ax \in A and x∈B∪Cx \in B \cup C. By the definition of union, x∈Bx \in B or x∈Cx \in C.
  2. In step 1, if x∈Bx \in B, then x∈A∩Bx \in A \cap B. If x∈Cx \in C, then x∈A∩Cx \in A \cap C. In both cases x∈(A∩B)∪(A∩C)x \in (A \cap B) \cup (A \cap C).
  3. Conversely, let x∈(A∩B)∪(A∩C)x \in (A \cap B) \cup (A \cap C). Then x∈A∩Bx \in A \cap B or x∈A∩Cx \in A \cap C.
  4. In step 3, if x∈A∩Bx \in A \cap B, then x∈Ax \in A and x∈B⊆B∪Cx \in B \subseteq B \cup C. If x∈A∩Cx \in A \cap C, then x∈Ax \in A and x∈C⊆B∪Cx \in C \subseteq B \cup C. In both cases x∈A∩(B∪C)x \in A \cap (B \cup C).
  5. By steps 2 and 4, the sets A∩(B∪C)A \cap (B \cup C) and (A∩B)∪(A∩C)(A \cap B) \cup (A \cap C) have the same elements. So they are equal.
  6. Let x∈A∪(B∩C)x \in A \cup (B \cap C). Then x∈Ax \in A or x∈B∩Cx \in B \cap C.
  7. In step 6, if x∈Ax \in A, then x∈A∪Bx \in A \cup B and x∈A∪Cx \in A \cup C. If x∈B∩Cx \in B \cap C, then x∈Bx \in B, so x∈A∪Bx \in A \cup B, and x∈Cx \in C, so x∈A∪Cx \in A \cup C.
  8. By step 7, in both cases x∈(A∪B)∩(A∪C)x \in (A \cup B) \cap (A \cup C).
  9. Conversely, let x∈(A∪B)∩(A∪C)x \in (A \cup B) \cap (A \cup C). Then x∈A∪Bx \in A \cup B and x∈A∪Cx \in A \cup C. By the law of excluded middle, either x∈Ax \in A or x∉Ax \notin A.
  10. In step 9, if x∈Ax \in A, then x∈A∪(B∩C)x \in A \cup (B \cap C).
  11. In step 9, if x∉Ax \notin A, then x∈A∪Bx \in A \cup B forces x∈Bx \in B, and x∈A∪Cx \in A \cup C forces x∈Cx \in C. So x∈B∩C⊆A∪(B∩C)x \in B \cap C \subseteq A \cup (B \cap C).
  12. By steps 8, 10 and 11, the sets A∪(B∩C)A \cup (B \cap C) and (A∪B)∩(A∪C)(A \cup B) \cap (A \cup C) have the same elements. So they are equal.

Idea

Membership in a union is an "or", and membership in an intersection is an "and". So each set law reduces to a statement about an element, checked by splitting into cases. For the second law, the useful split is whether or not xx lies in AA.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 17 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proof Proof of the law of excluded middle by a truth table.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Element definition
  2. Proposition concept
  3. Set definition
  4. Conjunction definition
  5. Disjunction definition
  6. Implication definition
  7. Negation definition
  8. Predicate definition
  9. Intersection definition
  10. Union definition
  11. Biconditional definition
  12. Truth table concept
  13. Universal quantifier definition
  14. Axiom of extensionality statement
  15. Proof of the law of excluded middle by a truth table proof
  16. Law of excluded middle statement
  17. Proof of the distributive laws for sets proof

Where this leads

1 page builds on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Intersection_Distributes_over_Union
  2. Web https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Union_Distributes_over_Intersection
About this page
Tag4WJHCT0JF4
URIm2://4WJHCT0JF4
Kindproof
WritingW0 stub
MSC03E20
ProvesDistributive laws for sets
UsesSet, Axiom of extensionality, Union, Intersection, Law of excluded middle
MethodsProof by cases
Changed4 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.