Mathematical logic and foundations Proof
Proof of the law of excluded middle by a truth table
Proof
We compute the truth table of .
- Let be a proposition. In classical logic, has exactly one of the two truth values, true or false.
- Suppose is true. By the definition of disjunction, is true, since its first part is true.
- Suppose is false. By the definition of negation, is true.
- In the case of step 3, is true by the definition of disjunction, since its second part is true.
- The two rows of the truth table are these.
| T | F | T |
| F | T | T |
- By step 1, steps 2 and 4 cover every possible truth value of . In each case is true. So is true for each proposition .
Idea
In classical logic a proposition has only two possible truth values. If is true, the first part of is true. If is false, the second part is true. Either way the disjunction is true.
Reading path
To understand this page from the ground up, read these 7 pages in order. The foundations come first.
Show the path as a graph
- no evidence level
- Proposition concept
- Conjunction definition
- Disjunction definition
- Implication definition
- Negation definition
- Truth table concept
- Proof of the law of excluded middle by a truth table proof
Where this leads
34 pages build on this one.
- Distributive laws for sets
- Law of excluded middle
- Transfinite induction
- Brouwer–Heyting–Kolmogorov interpretation
- Ordinal arithmetic
- Von Neumann universe
- Realizability
- Proof of the distributive laws for sets
- Intuitionistic logic
- Ordinal analysis
- Woodin cardinal
- Diaconescu's theorem
- Veblen function
- Brouwer–Heyting–Kolmogorov interpretation
- Kunen's inconsistency theorem
- Proof of transfinite induction from well-foundedness
- Constructive analysis
- Cut-elimination theorem
- Proof-theoretic ordinal
- Ordinal analysis
- Proof-theoretic ordinal
- Realizability
- Constructivism
- Constructivism
- Constructive analysis
- Normal function
- Sequent calculus
- Double-negation translation
- Gentzen's consistency proof
- Heyting arithmetic
- Erdős–Rado theorem
- Aleph number
- Beth number
- Dialectica interpretation
Further reading
About this page
| Tag | ZNQN1JW1V3 |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://ZNQN1JW1V3 |
| Kind | proof |
| Writing | W0 stub |
| MSC | 03B05 |
| Proves | Law of excluded middle |
| Uses | Proposition, Negation, Disjunction, Truth table |
| Changed | 4 November 2026 |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
- a source with a locator (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.