statement theorem
Triangle inequality for integrals
Statement
Let be Riemann integrable. Then is Riemann integrable on , and
Remarks
The inequality follows from and the monotonicity of the integral.
The converse of the first claim fails. On , let on the rationals and elsewhere. Then is integrable, but is not.
Mathlib states the inequality as intervalIntegral.norm_integral_le_integral_norm.
Explanations
L1 human
Cancellation can only make an integral smaller in size. The size of the integral is at most the integral of the size of the function.
What this node needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.
What this needs
To read this node, read these 16 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.
- no evidence level
- Partition of an interval definition
- Sequence definition
- Mesh of a partition definition
- Riemann sum definition
- Real sequence definition
- Riemann integrable function definition
- Limit of a sequence definition
- Series definition
- Riemann integral definition
- Convergent sequence definition
- Partial sum definition
- Definite integral definition
- Convergent series definition
- Monotonicity of the integral statement
- Absolute convergence definition
- Triangle inequality for integrals statement
Sources
- Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral, Inequalities
What links here
No node links to this node yet.