Math 2.0

statement theorem

Second isomorphism theorem for rings

Statement

Let RR be a ring, let SS be a subring of RR and let II be a two-sided ideal of RR. Then S+I={s+x:s∈S,x∈I}S + I = \{s + x : s \in S, x \in I\} is a subring of RR, and II is a two-sided ideal of S+IS + I. The intersection S∩IS \cap I is a two-sided ideal of SS. The map S/(S∩I)→(S+I)/IS/(S \cap I) \to (S + I)/I, s+(S∩I)↦s+Is + (S \cap I) \mapsto s + I, is a ring isomorphism.

Remarks

The proof applies the first isomorphism theorem to the map S→(S+I)/IS \to (S + I)/I, s↦s+Is \mapsto s + I. It is surjective, and its kernel is S∩IS \cap I. The theorem is also called the diamond theorem, after the picture of the four rings S∩IS \cap I, SS, II and S+IS + I.

Explanations

L1 human

The theorem compares two quotients. Divide the subring SS by its part inside II, or divide the larger ring S+IS + I by II. The two quotients are the same ring.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 9 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Group concept
  2. Ring definition
  3. Ideal definition
  4. Ring homomorphism definition
  5. Subring definition
  6. Two-sided ideal definition
  7. Ring isomorphism definition
  8. Quotient ring definition
  9. Second isomorphism theorem for rings statement

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isomorphism_theorems, Theorem B (rings)