Math 2.0

statement proposition

The only ideals of a field are zero and the whole field

Statement

Let KK be a field and let II be an ideal of KK. Then I={0}I = \{0\} or I=KI = K.

Remarks

The proof: if a∈Ia \in I and a≠0a \neq 0, then 1=a−1a∈I1 = a^{-1} a \in I, so r=r⋅1∈Ir = r \cdot 1 \in I for each r∈Kr \in K. The converse holds: a nonzero commutative ring whose only ideals are {0}\{0\} and the whole ring is a field. For each nonzero aa, the ideal (a)(a) is the whole ring, so 1=ba1 = b a for some bb.

Explanations

L1 human

If an ideal of a field contains a nonzero element, then it contains 11, because you can divide. Once an ideal contains 11, it contains every element. So a field has only the two trivial ideals.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 7 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Group concept
  2. Ring definition
  3. Commutative ring definition
  4. Ideal definition
  5. Unit of a ring definition
  6. Field definition
  7. The only ideals of a field are zero and the whole field statement

What depends on this

18 nodes use this node, directly or through other nodes.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideal_(ring_theory), Examples and properties