Math 2.0

statement theorem

Third isomorphism theorem for rings

Statement

Let RR be a ring and let I⊆JI \subseteq J be two-sided ideals of RR. Then J/I={a+I:a∈J}J/I = \{a + I : a \in J\} is a two-sided ideal of the quotient ring R/IR/I. The map (R/I)/(J/I)→R/J(R/I)/(J/I) \to R/J, (a+I)+J/I↦a+J(a + I) + J/I \mapsto a + J, is a ring isomorphism.

Remarks

The proof applies the first isomorphism theorem to the map R/I→R/JR/I \to R/J, a+I↦a+Ja + I \mapsto a + J. It is surjective, and its kernel is J/IJ/I. For example, 6Z⊆2Z6\mathbb{Z} \subseteq 2\mathbb{Z}, and (Z/6Z)/(2Z/6Z)≅Z/2Z(\mathbb{Z}/6\mathbb{Z})/(2\mathbb{Z}/6\mathbb{Z}) \cong \mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}.

Explanations

L1 human

You can make a quotient in two steps or in one step. Dividing first by II and then by the image of JJ gives the same ring as dividing directly by JJ.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 8 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Group concept
  2. Ring definition
  3. Ideal definition
  4. Ring homomorphism definition
  5. Two-sided ideal definition
  6. Ring isomorphism definition
  7. Quotient ring definition
  8. Third isomorphism theorem for rings statement

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isomorphism_theorems, Theorem C (rings)