Math 2.0

statement theorem

Comparison test for improper integrals

Statement

Let f,g ⁣:[a,∞)→Rf, g \colon [a, \infty) \to \mathbb{R} be Riemann integrable on each [a,b][a, b], with 0≤f(x)≤g(x)0 \le f(x) \le g(x) for all x≥ax \ge a. If ∫a∞g(x) dx\int_a^\infty g(x) \, dx converges, then ∫a∞f(x) dx\int_a^\infty f(x) \, dx converges, and ∫a∞f(x) dx≤∫a∞g(x) dx.\int_a^\infty f(x) \, dx \le \int_a^\infty g(x) \, dx. If ∫a∞f(x) dx\int_a^\infty f(x) \, dx diverges, then ∫a∞g(x) dx\int_a^\infty g(x) \, dx diverges.

Remarks

The function b↦∫abfb \mapsto \int_a^b f is increasing, and it is bounded by ∫a∞g\int_a^\infty g by monotonicity. A bounded monotone function has a limit. For example, 0≤e−x2≤e−x0 \le e^{-x^2} \le e^{-x} for x≥1x \ge 1. So ∫1∞e−x2 dx\int_1^\infty e^{-x^2} \, dx converges. The same test holds for integrals that are improper at a finite endpoint.

Explanations

L1 human

If a larger function has finite area, a smaller nonnegative function also has finite area. This lets us prove convergence without computing the integral.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 20 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Limit point of a set, definition, no evidence levelLimit point of a setdefinitionPartition of an interval, definition, no evidence levelPartition of an inter…definitionSequence, definition, no evidence levelSequencedefinitionLimit of a function, definition, no evidence levelLimit of a functiondefinitionMesh of a partition, definition, no evidence levelMesh of a partitiondefinitionRiemann sum, definition, no evidence levelRiemann sumdefinitionReal sequence, definition, no evidence levelReal sequencedefinitionLimit at infinity, definition, no evidence levelLimit at infinitydefinitionOne-sided limit, definition, no evidence levelOne-sided limitdefinitionRiemann integrable function, definition, no evidence levelRiemann integrable fu…definitionBounded sequence, definition, no evidence levelBounded sequencedefinitionLimit of a sequence, definition, no evidence levelLimit of a sequencedefinitionMonotone sequence, definition, no evidence levelMonotone sequencedefinitionRiemann integral, definition, no evidence levelRiemann integraldefinitionMonotone convergence theorem for sequences, statement, no evidence levelMonotone convergence …statementDefinite integral, definition, no evidence levelDefinite integraldefinitionImproper integral, definition, no evidence levelImproper integraldefinitionOne-sided limits of a monotone function exist, statement, no evidence levelOne-sided limits of a…statementMonotonicity of the integral, statement, no evidence levelMonotonicity of the i…statementComparison test for improper integrals, statement, no evidence levelComparison test for i…statement
Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Limit point of a set definition
  2. Partition of an interval definition
  3. Sequence definition
  4. Limit of a function definition
  5. Mesh of a partition definition
  6. Riemann sum definition
  7. Real sequence definition
  8. Limit at infinity definition
  9. One-sided limit definition
  10. Riemann integrable function definition
  11. Bounded sequence definition
  12. Limit of a sequence definition
  13. Monotone sequence definition
  14. Riemann integral definition
  15. Monotone convergence theorem for sequences statement
  16. Definite integral definition
  17. Improper integral definition
  18. One-sided limits of a monotone function exist statement
  19. Monotonicity of the integral statement
  20. Comparison test for improper integrals statement

What depends on this

3 nodes use this node, directly or through other nodes.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Improper_integral, Convergence of the integral