Math 2.0

statement theorem

Differentiation under the integral sign

Statement

Let f ⁣:[a,b]×[t0,t1]→Rf \colon [a, b] \times [t_0, t_1] \to \mathbb{R} be continuous, and suppose that its partial derivative ∂f/∂t\partial f / \partial t exists and is continuous on [a,b]×[t0,t1][a, b] \times [t_0, t_1]. Then F(t)=∫abf(x,t) dxF(t) = \int_a^b f(x, t) \, dx is continuously differentiable on [t0,t1][t_0, t_1], and F′(t)=∫ab∂f∂t(x,t) dx.F'(t) = \int_a^b \frac{\partial f}{\partial t}(x, t) \, dx. If, in addition, α,β ⁣:[t0,t1]→[a,b]\alpha, \beta \colon [t_0, t_1] \to [a, b] are continuously differentiable, then ddt∫α(t)β(t)f(x,t) dx=∫α(t)β(t)∂f∂t(x,t) dx+f(β(t),t) β′(t)−f(α(t),t) α′(t).\frac{d}{dt} \int_{\alpha(t)}^{\beta(t)} f(x, t) \, dx = \int_{\alpha(t)}^{\beta(t)} \frac{\partial f}{\partial t}(x, t) \, dx + f(\beta(t), t) \, \beta'(t) - f(\alpha(t), t) \, \alpha'(t).

Remarks

The second formula follows from the first, the fundamental theorem of calculus and the chain rule, applied to G(u,v,t)=∫uvf(x,t) dxG(u, v, t) = \int_u^v f(x, t) \, dx. A measure theory version: let f(⋅,t)f(\cdot, t) be integrable for each tt in an open set, let ∂f/∂t\partial f / \partial t exist for almost all xx, and let ∣∂f/∂t(x,t)∣≤g(x)|\partial f / \partial t (x, t)| \le g(x) for an integrable gg. Then the same rule holds. Its proof uses the dominated convergence theorem. Example: let F(t)=∫01xt−1ln⁡x dxF(t) = \int_0^1 \frac{x^t - 1}{\ln x} \, dx for t≥0t \ge 0. For t>0t > 0 the measure version, with g=1g = 1, gives F′(t)=∫01xt dx=1t+1F'(t) = \int_0^1 x^t \, dx = \frac{1}{t + 1}. Since FF is continuous with F(0)=0F(0) = 0, F(t)=ln⁡(1+t)F(t) = \ln(1 + t).

Explanations

L1 human

If the integrand depends smoothly on a parameter, you can differentiate the integral by differentiating inside it. When the limits of integration also move, the values of the integrand at the moving limits add extra terms.

What this node needs for W2
  • edge about out: the concepts that the statement is about (0 of 1)
  • edge proves in: at least one proof node (0 of 1)
  • edge instance_of or illustrates in: one example that shows the statement at work (0 of 1)
  • explanation L2 (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 11 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Euclidean space object
  2. Function concept
  3. Function composition concept
  4. Fréchet derivative definition
  5. Function of several variables concept
  6. Limit of a function of several variables concept
  7. Continuity in R^n definition
  8. Differentiable function of several variables definition
  9. Partial derivative definition
  10. Chain rule in several variables statement
  11. Differentiation under the integral sign statement

What depends on this

16 nodes use this node, directly or through other nodes.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leibniz_integral_rule, General form: differentiation under the integral sign
  2. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leibniz_integral_rule, Measure theory statement