Math 2.0

statement proposition

Independence means the joint law is the product of the marginals

Statement

Let XX and YY be random variables on one probability space, with values in measurable spaces (E1,E1)(E_1, \mathcal{E}_1) and (E2,E2)(E_2, \mathcal{E}_2). Let μX\mu_X and μY\mu_Y be their laws, and let μ(X,Y)\mu_{(X, Y)} be the joint law of the pair (X,Y)(X, Y) on E1×E2E_1 \times E_2. Then XX and YY are independent if and only if μ(X,Y)=μX⊗μY\mu_{(X, Y)} = \mu_X \otimes \mu_Y, the product measure of the two marginal laws.

Remarks

The statement is a direct translation of the definition: μ(X,Y)(A×B)=P(X∈A,Y∈B)\mu_{(X, Y)}(A \times B) = P(X \in A, Y \in B) and (μX⊗μY)(A×B)=μX(A) μY(B)(\mu_X \otimes \mu_Y)(A \times B) = \mu_X(A) \, \mu_Y(B). Two probability measures on E1×E2E_1 \times E_2 that agree on all rectangles A×BA \times B are equal, because the rectangles form a π-system that generates the product σ-algebra. For real random variables, it follows that F(X,Y)(x,y)=FX(x) FY(y)F_{(X, Y)}(x, y) = F_X(x) \, F_Y(y). If XX and YY have densities, the joint density is fX(x) fY(y)f_X(x) \, f_Y(y). The same result holds for nn random variables: they are independent if and only if their joint law is μX1⊗⋯⊗μXn\mu_{X_1} \otimes \dots \otimes \mu_{X_n}.

Explanations

L1 human

For independent variables, the full joint picture is fixed by the two separate pictures. You find the chance of a pair of outcomes by multiplying the chances of the two outcomes.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What depends on this

23 nodes use this node, directly or through other nodes.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independence_(probability_theory), Two random variables