Proof of the handshaking lemma by double counting
Proof
We use double counting of vertex–edge incidences.
- The set is finite. The edge set consists of -element subsets of , so is finite too.
- Let , the set of incidences.
- Fix . The number of with is the number of edges that contain . By the definition of the degree, this is .
- Fix . The number of with is , since each edge of a graph is a -element subset of .
- Counting by its first coordinate gives , by step 3.
- Counting by its second coordinate gives , by step 4.
- Comparing steps 5 and 6 gives .
Idea
Each edge has exactly two ends. Adding up the degrees counts every edge once at each end, so every edge is counted twice.
Reading path
To understand this page from the ground up, read these 6 pages in order. The foundations come first.
Show the path as a graph
- no evidence level
- Double counting concept
- Graph definition
- Edge set definition
- Neighbourhood definition
- Degree of a vertex definition
- Proof of the handshaking lemma by double counting proof
Where this leads
7 pages build on this one.
Further reading
About this page
| Tag | 4M6ESXZ5B0 |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://4M6ESXZ5B0 |
| Kind | proof |
| Writing | W0 stub |
| MSC | 05C07 |
| Proves | Handshaking lemma |
| Uses | Graph, Edge set, Degree of a vertex, Double counting |
| Changed | 4 November 2026 |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
- a source with a locator (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.