Proof that the integers are a Euclidean domain
Builds on The ring of integersIntegral domainEuclidean domainWell-ordering principle
Proof
We use the well-ordering principle. Let be the ring of integers.
- The ring is commutative and . If and , then , so . So is an integral domain.
- For , is a natural number. So is a function .
- Let with . Let , where contains .
- Let if and if . In both cases .
- Then , because . So , and is nonempty.
- By the well-ordering principle, has a least element . Write with , so and .
- Suppose that . Let if and if , so that .
- Then , so . But , because . This contradicts the choice of .
- Hence . This proves the division with remainder in the statement.
- If , then . So or .
- By steps 1, 2 and 10, is a Euclidean domain with Euclidean function .
Idea
Among all the nonnegative numbers , take the smallest one. If it were at least , we could subtract once more and stay nonnegative, which would give a smaller one. So the smallest one is less than .
Reading path
To understand this page from the ground up, read these 23 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proofs Proof of the commutativity of addition by induction, Proof of strong induction from ordinary induction, Proof of the well-ordering principle from strong induction.
Show the path as a graph
- no evidence level
- Definition by recursion concept
- Group concept
- Mathematical induction concept
- Natural numbers object
- Peano axioms concept
- Ring definition
- Successor function definition
- Commutative ring definition
- Zero divisor definition
- Addition of natural numbers definition
- The successor function is injective statement
- Zero is not a successor statement
- The ring of integers example
- Integral domain definition
- Proof of the commutativity of addition by induction proof
- Order on the natural numbers definition
- Euclidean domain definition
- Commutativity of addition statement
- Proof of strong induction from ordinary induction proof
- Strong induction statement
- Proof of the well-ordering principle from strong induction proof
- Well-ordering principle statement
- Proof that the integers are a Euclidean domain proof
Where this leads
14 pages build on this one.
- The integers are a Euclidean domain
- Eisenstein's criterion
- Impossibility of doubling the cube
- Reduction modulo p test for irreducibility
- Irreducibility of the cyclotomic polynomials over the rationals
- Gauss–Wantzel theorem
- Proof of the impossibility of doubling the cube
- Proof of Eisenstein's criterion
- Cyclotomic field
- Proof of the irreducibility of the cyclotomic polynomials by reduction modulo primes
- Quintic equation
- Proof of the Gauss–Wantzel theorem
- Proof of the reduction modulo p test for irreducibility
- Impossibility of the classical construction problems
Further reading
- Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclidean_division, Proof, Existence
About this page
| Tag | GABXWM26TP |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://GABXWM26TP |
| Kind | proof |
| Writing | W0 stub |
| MSC | 11A05 |
| Proves | The integers are a Euclidean domain |
| Uses | The ring of integers, Integral domain, Euclidean domain, Well-ordering principle |
| Changed | 4 November 2026 |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.