Math 2.0

Number theory Proof

Proof that the integers are a Euclidean domain

Builds on The ring of integersIntegral domainEuclidean domainWell-ordering principle

Proof

We use the well-ordering principle. Let ℤ\Z be the ring of integers.

  1. The ring ℤ\Z is commutative and 1≠01 \neq 0. If a≠0a \neq 0 and b≠0b \neq 0, then ∣ab∣=∣a∣∣b∣≥1\abs{a b} = \abs{a} \abs{b} \ge 1, so ab≠0a b \neq 0. So ℤ\Z is an integral domain.
  2. For n≠0n \neq 0, δ(n)=∣n∣\delta(n) = \abs{n} is a natural number. So δ\delta is a function ℤ∖{0}→ℕ\Z \setminus \set{0} \to \N.
  3. Let a,b∈ℤa, b \in \Z with b≠0b \neq 0. Let S={a−bq:q∈ℤ}∩ℕS = \set{a - b q : q \in \Z} \cap \N, where ℕ\N contains 00.
  4. Let q0=−∣a∣q_0 = -\abs{a} if b>0b > 0 and q0=∣a∣q_0 = \abs{a} if b<0b < 0. In both cases bq0=−∣a∣∣b∣b q_0 = -\abs{a} \abs{b}.
  5. Then a−bq0=a+∣a∣∣b∣≥a+∣a∣≥0a - b q_0 = a + \abs{a} \abs{b} \ge a + \abs{a} \ge 0, because ∣b∣≥1\abs{b} \ge 1. So a−bq0∈Sa - b q_0 \in S, and SS is nonempty.
  6. By the well-ordering principle, SS has a least element rr. Write r=a−bqr = a - b q with q∈ℤq \in \Z, so a=bq+ra = b q + r and r≥0r \ge 0.
  7. Suppose that r≥∣b∣r \ge \abs{b}. Let e=1e = 1 if b>0b > 0 and e=−1e = -1 if b<0b < 0, so that be=∣b∣b e = \abs{b}.
  8. Then a−b(q+e)=r−∣b∣≥0a - b (q + e) = r - \abs{b} \ge 0, so r−∣b∣∈Sr - \abs{b} \in S. But r−∣b∣<rr - \abs{b} < r, because ∣b∣≥1\abs{b} \ge 1. This contradicts the choice of rr.
  9. Hence 0≤r<∣b∣0 \le r < \abs{b}. This proves the division with remainder in the statement.
  10. If r≠0r \neq 0, then δ(r)=r<∣b∣=δ(b)\delta(r) = r < \abs{b} = \delta(b). So r=0r = 0 or δ(r)<δ(b)\delta(r) < \delta(b).
  11. By steps 1, 2 and 10, ℤ\Z is a Euclidean domain with Euclidean function δ(n)=∣n∣\delta(n) = \abs{n}.

Idea

Among all the nonnegative numbers a−bqa - b q, take the smallest one. If it were at least ∣b∣\abs{b}, we could subtract ∣b∣\abs{b} once more and stay nonnegative, which would give a smaller one. So the smallest one is less than ∣b∣\abs{b}.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 23 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proofs Proof of the commutativity of addition by induction, Proof of strong induction from ordinary induction, Proof of the well-ordering principle from strong induction.

Show the path as a graph
Definition by recursion, concept, no evidence levelDefinition by recursi…conceptGroup, concept, no evidence levelGroupconceptMathematical induction, concept, no evidence levelMathematical inductionconceptNatural numbers, object, no evidence levelNatural numbersobjectPeano axioms, concept, no evidence levelPeano axiomsconceptRing, definition, no evidence levelRingdefinitionSuccessor function, definition, no evidence levelSuccessor functiondefinitionCommutative ring, definition, no evidence levelCommutative ringdefinitionZero divisor, definition, no evidence levelZero divisordefinitionAddition of natural numbers, definition, no evidence levelAddition of natural n…definitionThe successor function is injective, statement, no evidence levelThe successor functio…statementZero is not a successor, statement, no evidence levelZero is not a success…statementThe ring of integers, example, no evidence levelThe ring of integersexampleIntegral domain, definition, no evidence levelIntegral domaindefinitionProof of the commutativity of addition by induction, proof, no evidence levelProof of the commutat…proofOrder on the natural numbers, definition, no evidence levelOrder on the natural …definitionEuclidean domain, definition, no evidence levelEuclidean domaindefinitionCommutativity of addition, statement, no evidence levelCommutativity of addi…statementProof of strong induction from ordinary induction, proof, no evidence levelProof of strong induc…proofStrong induction, statement, no evidence levelStrong inductionstatementProof of the well-ordering principle from strong induction, proof, no evidence levelProof of the well-ord…proofWell-ordering principle, statement, no evidence levelWell-ordering princip…statementProof that the integers are a Euclidean domain, proof, no evidence levelProof that the intege…proof
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Definition by recursion concept
  2. Group concept
  3. Mathematical induction concept
  4. Natural numbers object
  5. Peano axioms concept
  6. Ring definition
  7. Successor function definition
  8. Commutative ring definition
  9. Zero divisor definition
  10. Addition of natural numbers definition
  11. The successor function is injective statement
  12. Zero is not a successor statement
  13. The ring of integers example
  14. Integral domain definition
  15. Proof of the commutativity of addition by induction proof
  16. Order on the natural numbers definition
  17. Euclidean domain definition
  18. Commutativity of addition statement
  19. Proof of strong induction from ordinary induction proof
  20. Strong induction statement
  21. Proof of the well-ordering principle from strong induction proof
  22. Well-ordering principle statement
  23. Proof that the integers are a Euclidean domain proof

Where this leads

14 pages build on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclidean_division, Proof, Existence
About this page
TagGABXWM26TP
URIm2://GABXWM26TP
Kindproof
WritingW0 stub
MSC11A05
ProvesThe integers are a Euclidean domain
UsesThe ring of integers, Integral domain, Euclidean domain, Well-ordering principle
Changed4 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.