Field theory and polynomials Proof
Proof of Eisenstein's criterion
Builds on Irreducible polynomialGauss's lemmaPrimitive polynomialThe integers are a Euclidean domainEuclidean domains are principal ideal domainsPID implies UFDThe rationals as the field of fractions of the integersEuclid's lemmaPrime numberDegree of a productUnit of a ring
Proof
- Let and the prime satisfy the three hypotheses. Since , we have , so .
- The ring is a Euclidean domain, hence a principal ideal domain, hence a unique factorisation domain. Its field of fractions is .
- Let be the greatest common divisor of , and let . Write with .
- The polynomial is primitive. Indeed, if an integer with divides every , then divides every , which contradicts the choice of .
- Since and , we have . For , , so by Euclid's lemma.
- Also , since divides . And , since otherwise would divide . So satisfies the three hypotheses.
- In , and is a unit. So is irreducible in if and only if is.
- By Gauss's lemma and Step 4, it is enough to show that is irreducible in . We argue by contradiction.
- The units of are . Indeed, if , then by the degree of a product, and with .
- Since , the polynomial is nonzero and not a unit. Suppose that with not units.
- If were a constant , then would divide every coefficient of . By Step 4, , a unit. So , and in the same way .
- Write and with . Then and , so . Set for and for .
- We have . Since , Euclid's lemma gives or . Both cannot hold, because . Say and .
- We show by induction on that for . The case is Step 13.
- Let and assume for all . Comparing coefficients of gives .
- Since , we have by Step 5. Each term with is divisible by . So .
- Since , Euclid's lemma gives . This completes the induction.
- In particular . The leading coefficient of is , so . This contradicts Step 6.
- So is irreducible in . By Steps 7 and 8, is irreducible in .
Idea
After Gauss's lemma, a factorisation over becomes one over . The prime divides exactly one of the two constant terms. Comparing coefficients one degree at a time pushes through all coefficients of that factor, up to its leading coefficient. Then would divide the leading coefficient of , which is excluded.
Reading path
To understand this page from the ground up, read these 110 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proofs Proof of Bézout's identity, Proof that in a UFD irreducible elements are prime, Proof of cancellation in an integral domain, Proof of the generalized Euclid's lemma, Proof of the commutativity of addition by induction, Proof that R/P is an integral domain iff P is prime, Proof that every principal ideal domain is a unique factorisation domain, Proof of Euclid's lemma, Proof that R[x] is an integral domain iff R is, Proof that the product of primitive polynomials is primitive, Proof that maximal ideals are prime, Proof of the degree of a product over an integral domain, Proof of strong induction from ordinary induction, Proof of the correspondence theorem for rings, Proof that R/M is a field iff M is maximal, Proof that the integers are a Euclidean domain, Proof that the only ideals of a field are zero and the whole field, Proof of the well-ordering principle from strong induction, Proof of the division algorithm, Proof of Gauss's lemma on irreducibility over a UFD, Proof that prime elements are irreducible in an integral domain, Proof that in a PID a nonzero element is irreducible iff it generates a maximal ideal, Proof that Euclidean domains are principal ideal domains.
- Definition by recursion concept
- Divisibility definition
- Element definition
- Group concept
- Mathematical induction concept
- Natural numbers object
- Peano axioms concept
- Proposition concept
- Greatest common divisor definition
- Prime number definition
- Set definition
- Ring definition
- Successor function definition
- Implication definition
- Predicate definition
- Coprime integers definition
- Ordered pair definition
- Addition of natural numbers definition
- Commutative ring definition
- Ideal definition
- Polynomial ring definition
- Unit of a ring definition
- Zero divisor definition
- The successor function is injective statement
- Zero is not a successor statement
- Existential quantifier definition
- Universal quantifier definition
- Cartesian product definition
- Divisibility in a commutative ring definition
- The ring of integers example
- Proof of the commutativity of addition by induction proof
- Ideal generated by a subset definition
- Order on the natural numbers definition
- Prime ideal definition
- Maximal ideal definition
- Two-sided ideal definition
- Field definition
- Degree of a polynomial definition
- Integral domain definition
- Subset definition
- Uniqueness quantifier definition
- Commutativity of addition statement
- Associate elements definition
- Prime element definition
- Principal ideal definition
- Proof of strong induction from ordinary induction proof
- Quotient ring definition
- Proof of cancellation in an integral domain proof
- Binary relation definition
- Proof that the only ideals of a field are zero and the whole field proof
- Irreducible element definition
- Field of fractions definition
- Leading coefficient definition
- Euclidean domain definition
- Greatest common divisor in an integral domain definition
- Strong induction statement
- Proof that R/M is a field iff M is maximal proof
- Proof that R/P is an integral domain iff P is prime proof
- The rationals as the field of fractions of the integers example
- Irreducible polynomial definition
- Principal ideal domain definition
- The only ideals of a field are zero and the whole field statement
- Unique factorisation domain definition
- Cancellation in an integral domain statement
- Proof of the degree of a product over an integral domain proof
- Function definition
- Proof of the well-ordering principle from strong induction proof
- Content of a polynomial definition
- R/P is an integral domain iff P is prime statement
- Proof that in a PID a nonzero element is irreducible iff it generates a maximal ideal proof
- Proof that prime elements are irreducible in an integral domain proof
- Degree of a product statement
- Codomain definition
- Injective function definition
- Image of a set definition
- Preimage of a set definition
- Primitive polynomial definition
- Well-ordering principle statement
- In a PID a nonzero element is irreducible iff it generates a maximal ideal statement
- Prime elements are irreducible in an integral domain statement
- Proof that R[x] is an integral domain iff R is proof
- Surjective function definition
- Proof of the division algorithm proof
- Proof that Euclidean domains are principal ideal domains proof
- Proof that in a UFD irreducible elements are prime proof
- Bijective function definition
- R[x] is an integral domain iff R is statement
- Proof that the integers are a Euclidean domain proof
- Division algorithm statement
- In a UFD irreducible elements are prime statement
- Proof of the correspondence theorem for rings proof
- Euclidean domains are principal ideal domains statement
- The integers are a Euclidean domain statement
- Proof of Bézout's identity proof
- Correspondence theorem for rings statement
- Proof that the product of primitive polynomials is primitive proof
- Proof of Gauss's lemma on irreducibility over a UFD proof
- Bézout's identity statement
- Product of primitive polynomials is primitive statement
- R/M is a field iff M is maximal statement
- Proof of the generalized Euclid's lemma proof
- Gauss's lemma statement
- Proof that maximal ideals are prime proof
- Generalized Euclid's lemma statement
- Maximal ideals are prime statement
- Proof of Euclid's lemma proof
- Proof that every principal ideal domain is a unique factorisation domain proof
- Euclid's lemma statement
- PID implies UFD statement
- Proof of Eisenstein's criterion proof
Where this leads
5 pages build on this one.
Further reading
- Web https://www.jmilne.org/math/CourseNotes/FT.pdf, Proposition 1.16
- Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisenstein%27s_criterion, Basic proof
About this page
| Tag | AQAKY2RTJZ |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://AQAKY2RTJZ |
| Kind | proof |
| Writing | W0 stub |
| MSC | 12E05 |
| Proves | Eisenstein's criterion |
| Uses | Irreducible polynomial, Gauss's lemma, Primitive polynomial, The integers are a Euclidean domain, Euclidean domains are principal ideal domains, PID implies UFD, The rationals as the field of fractions of the integers, Euclid's lemma, Prime number, Degree of a product, Unit of a ring |
| Methods | Proof by contradiction |
| Changed | 4 November 2026 |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.