Math 2.0

Field theory and polynomials Proof

Proof of Eisenstein's criterion

Builds on Irreducible polynomialGauss's lemmaPrimitive polynomialThe integers are a Euclidean domainEuclidean domains are principal ideal domainsPID implies UFDThe rationals as the field of fractions of the integersEuclid's lemmaPrime numberDegree of a productUnit of a ring

Proof

  1. Let f=anxn+⋯+a0∈ℤ[x]f = a_n x^n + \dots + a_0 \in \Z[x] and the prime pp satisfy the three hypotheses. Since p∤anp \nmid a_n, we have an≠0a_n \ne 0, so deg⁡f=n≥1\deg f = n \ge 1.
  2. The ring ℤ\Z is a Euclidean domain, hence a principal ideal domain, hence a unique factorisation domain. Its field of fractions is ℚ\Q.
  3. Let c>0c > 0 be the greatest common divisor of a0,…,ana_0, \dots, a_n, and let f0=f/c∈ℤ[x]f_0 = f / c \in \Z[x]. Write f0=∑iai′xif_0 = \sum_i a'_i x^i with ai′=ai/ca'_i = a_i / c.
  4. The polynomial f0f_0 is primitive. Indeed, if an integer rr with ∣r∣≥2\abs{r} \ge 2 divides every ai′a'_i, then c∣r∣c \abs{r} divides every aia_i, which contradicts the choice of cc.
  5. Since c∣anc \mid a_n and p∤anp \nmid a_n, we have p∤cp \nmid c. For i<ni < n, p∣ai=c ai′p \mid a_i = c \, a'_i, so p∣ai′p \mid a'_i by Euclid's lemma.
  6. Also p∤an′p \nmid a'_n, since an′a'_n divides ana_n. And p2∤a0′p^2 \nmid a'_0, since otherwise p2p^2 would divide c a0′=a0c \, a'_0 = a_0. So f0f_0 satisfies the three hypotheses.
  7. In ℚ[x]\Q[x], f=cf0f = c f_0 and cc is a unit. So ff is irreducible in ℚ[x]\Q[x] if and only if f0f_0 is.
  8. By Gauss's lemma and Step 4, it is enough to show that f0f_0 is irreducible in ℤ[x]\Z[x]. We argue by contradiction.
  9. The units of ℤ[x]\Z[x] are ±1\pm 1. Indeed, if uv=1u v = 1, then deg⁡u=deg⁡v=0\deg u = \deg v = 0 by the degree of a product, and u,v∈ℤu, v \in \Z with uv=1u v = 1.
  10. Since deg⁡f0=n≥1\deg f_0 = n \ge 1, the polynomial f0f_0 is nonzero and not a unit. Suppose that f0=ghf_0 = g h with g,h∈ℤ[x]g, h \in \Z[x] not units.
  11. If gg were a constant rr, then rr would divide every coefficient of f0f_0. By Step 4, r=±1r = \pm 1, a unit. So deg⁡g≥1\deg g \ge 1, and in the same way deg⁡h≥1\deg h \ge 1.
  12. Write g=bsxs+⋯+b0g = b_s x^s + \dots + b_0 and h=ctxt+⋯+c0h = c_t x^t + \dots + c_0 with bsct≠0b_s c_t \ne 0. Then s,t≥1s, t \ge 1 and s+t=ns + t = n, so s<ns < n. Set bj=0b_j = 0 for j>sj > s and cj=0c_j = 0 for j>tj > t.
  13. We have a0′=b0c0a'_0 = b_0 c_0. Since p∣a0′p \mid a'_0, Euclid's lemma gives p∣b0p \mid b_0 or p∣c0p \mid c_0. Both cannot hold, because p2∤a0′p^2 \nmid a'_0. Say p∣b0p \mid b_0 and p∤c0p \nmid c_0.
  14. We show by induction on ii that p∣bip \mid b_i for 0≤i≤s0 \le i \le s. The case i=0i = 0 is Step 13.
  15. Let 1≤i≤s1 \le i \le s and assume p∣bjp \mid b_j for all j<ij < i. Comparing coefficients of xix^i gives ai′=bic0+∑j=0i−1bjci−ja'_i = b_i c_0 + \sum_{j=0}^{i-1} b_j c_{i-j}.
  16. Since i≤s<ni \le s < n, we have p∣ai′p \mid a'_i by Step 5. Each term bjci−jb_j c_{i-j} with j<ij < i is divisible by pp. So p∣bic0p \mid b_i c_0.
  17. Since p∤c0p \nmid c_0, Euclid's lemma gives p∣bip \mid b_i. This completes the induction.
  18. In particular p∣bsp \mid b_s. The leading coefficient of f0f_0 is an′=bscta'_n = b_s c_t, so p∣an′p \mid a'_n. This contradicts Step 6.
  19. So f0f_0 is irreducible in ℤ[x]\Z[x]. By Steps 7 and 8, ff is irreducible in ℚ[x]\Q[x].

Idea

After Gauss's lemma, a factorisation over ℚ\Q becomes one over ℤ\Z. The prime pp divides exactly one of the two constant terms. Comparing coefficients one degree at a time pushes pp through all coefficients of that factor, up to its leading coefficient. Then pp would divide the leading coefficient of ff, which is excluded.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 110 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proofs Proof of Bézout's identity, Proof that in a UFD irreducible elements are prime, Proof of cancellation in an integral domain, Proof of the generalized Euclid's lemma, Proof of the commutativity of addition by induction, Proof that R/P is an integral domain iff P is prime, Proof that every principal ideal domain is a unique factorisation domain, Proof of Euclid's lemma, Proof that R[x] is an integral domain iff R is, Proof that the product of primitive polynomials is primitive, Proof that maximal ideals are prime, Proof of the degree of a product over an integral domain, Proof of strong induction from ordinary induction, Proof of the correspondence theorem for rings, Proof that R/M is a field iff M is maximal, Proof that the integers are a Euclidean domain, Proof that the only ideals of a field are zero and the whole field, Proof of the well-ordering principle from strong induction, Proof of the division algorithm, Proof of Gauss's lemma on irreducibility over a UFD, Proof that prime elements are irreducible in an integral domain, Proof that in a PID a nonzero element is irreducible iff it generates a maximal ideal, Proof that Euclidean domains are principal ideal domains.

  1. Definition by recursion concept
  2. Divisibility definition
  3. Element definition
  4. Group concept
  5. Mathematical induction concept
  6. Natural numbers object
  7. Peano axioms concept
  8. Proposition concept
  9. Greatest common divisor definition
  10. Prime number definition
  11. Set definition
  12. Ring definition
  13. Successor function definition
  14. Implication definition
  15. Predicate definition
  16. Coprime integers definition
  17. Ordered pair definition
  18. Addition of natural numbers definition
  19. Commutative ring definition
  20. Ideal definition
  21. Polynomial ring definition
  22. Unit of a ring definition
  23. Zero divisor definition
  24. The successor function is injective statement
  25. Zero is not a successor statement
  26. Existential quantifier definition
  27. Universal quantifier definition
  28. Cartesian product definition
  29. Divisibility in a commutative ring definition
  30. The ring of integers example
  31. Proof of the commutativity of addition by induction proof
  32. Ideal generated by a subset definition
  33. Order on the natural numbers definition
  34. Prime ideal definition
  35. Maximal ideal definition
  36. Two-sided ideal definition
  37. Field definition
  38. Degree of a polynomial definition
  39. Integral domain definition
  40. Subset definition
  41. Uniqueness quantifier definition
  42. Commutativity of addition statement
  43. Associate elements definition
  44. Prime element definition
  45. Principal ideal definition
  46. Proof of strong induction from ordinary induction proof
  47. Quotient ring definition
  48. Proof of cancellation in an integral domain proof
  49. Binary relation definition
  50. Proof that the only ideals of a field are zero and the whole field proof
  51. Irreducible element definition
  52. Field of fractions definition
  53. Leading coefficient definition
  54. Euclidean domain definition
  55. Greatest common divisor in an integral domain definition
  56. Strong induction statement
  57. Proof that R/M is a field iff M is maximal proof
  58. Proof that R/P is an integral domain iff P is prime proof
  59. The rationals as the field of fractions of the integers example
  60. Irreducible polynomial definition
  61. Principal ideal domain definition
  62. The only ideals of a field are zero and the whole field statement
  63. Unique factorisation domain definition
  64. Cancellation in an integral domain statement
  65. Proof of the degree of a product over an integral domain proof
  66. Function definition
  67. Proof of the well-ordering principle from strong induction proof
  68. Content of a polynomial definition
  69. R/P is an integral domain iff P is prime statement
  70. Proof that in a PID a nonzero element is irreducible iff it generates a maximal ideal proof
  71. Proof that prime elements are irreducible in an integral domain proof
  72. Degree of a product statement
  73. Codomain definition
  74. Injective function definition
  75. Image of a set definition
  76. Preimage of a set definition
  77. Primitive polynomial definition
  78. Well-ordering principle statement
  79. In a PID a nonzero element is irreducible iff it generates a maximal ideal statement
  80. Prime elements are irreducible in an integral domain statement
  81. Proof that R[x] is an integral domain iff R is proof
  82. Surjective function definition
  83. Proof of the division algorithm proof
  84. Proof that Euclidean domains are principal ideal domains proof
  85. Proof that in a UFD irreducible elements are prime proof
  86. Bijective function definition
  87. R[x] is an integral domain iff R is statement
  88. Proof that the integers are a Euclidean domain proof
  89. Division algorithm statement
  90. In a UFD irreducible elements are prime statement
  91. Proof of the correspondence theorem for rings proof
  92. Euclidean domains are principal ideal domains statement
  93. The integers are a Euclidean domain statement
  94. Proof of Bézout's identity proof
  95. Correspondence theorem for rings statement
  96. Proof that the product of primitive polynomials is primitive proof
  97. Proof of Gauss's lemma on irreducibility over a UFD proof
  98. Bézout's identity statement
  99. Product of primitive polynomials is primitive statement
  100. R/M is a field iff M is maximal statement
  101. Proof of the generalized Euclid's lemma proof
  102. Gauss's lemma statement
  103. Proof that maximal ideals are prime proof
  104. Generalized Euclid's lemma statement
  105. Maximal ideals are prime statement
  106. Proof of Euclid's lemma proof
  107. Proof that every principal ideal domain is a unique factorisation domain proof
  108. Euclid's lemma statement
  109. PID implies UFD statement
  110. Proof of Eisenstein's criterion proof

Where this leads

5 pages build on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://www.jmilne.org/math/CourseNotes/FT.pdf, Proposition 1.16
  2. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisenstein%27s_criterion, Basic proof
About this page
TagAQAKY2RTJZ
URIm2://AQAKY2RTJZ
Kindproof
WritingW0 stub
MSC12E05
ProvesEisenstein's criterion
UsesIrreducible polynomial, Gauss's lemma, Primitive polynomial, The integers are a Euclidean domain, Euclidean domains are principal ideal domains, PID implies UFD, The rationals as the field of fractions of the integers, Euclid's lemma, Prime number, Degree of a product, Unit of a ring
MethodsProof by contradiction
Changed4 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.