Proof that every principal ideal domain is a unique factorisation domain
Builds on Principal ideal domainUnique factorisation domainIrreducible elementPrime elementAssociate elementsUnit of a ringIdealIdeal generated by a subsetIn a PID a nonzero element is irreducible iff it generates a maximal idealMaximal ideals are primePrime idealCancellation in an integral domain
Proof
Let be a principal ideal domain. A factorisation of means with and all irreducible.
First we show that factorisations exist.
- For , the set is an ideal that contains . Every ideal containing contains . So the ideal generated by is .
- Let with and not a unit. Then . If , then for some , so .
- In that case cancellation gives , and is a unit, which is false. So .
- Let be an infinite chain of principal ideals. Let be the union of the ideals .
- If and , then both lie in with . So and for . Thus is an ideal.
- Since is a principal ideal domain, for some . Then for some , so .
- This contradicts . So has no infinite strictly increasing chain of principal ideals.
- Call an element bad if it is nonzero, not a unit, and has no factorisation. Suppose that some is bad.
- The element is not irreducible, because an irreducible element is a factorisation of length . So with and not units. Both are nonzero, since .
- If and both had factorisations, then joining them would give a factorisation of . So or is bad. Call it , and call the other factor .
- Then with not a unit. By steps 2 and 3, .
- Repeating steps 9 to 11 with , then , and so on, gives an infinite chain . This contradicts step 7.
- So no element is bad. Every nonzero element that is not a unit has a factorisation.
Now we show uniqueness.
- Let be irreducible. By the theorem on irreducible elements in a PID, is a maximal ideal. Since maximal ideals are prime, is a prime ideal.
- So if , then , hence or . Since and is not a unit, is a prime element.
- If a prime divides , then divides some . This follows by induction on , writing .
- If is irreducible and is a unit, then is irreducible. It is nonzero and not a unit, since . If , then , so or is a unit.
- Associates form an equivalence relation: if and with units , then and .
- Let with all irreducible and . By induction on , we prove that and that some permutation makes and associates.
- By steps 15 and 16, divides some , say . Since is irreducible and is not a unit, is a unit. So and are associates.
- Cancelling gives . Here an empty product is .
- Let . If , step 21 gives , so each with is a unit. This is false, so , and works.
- Let . If , step 21 gives , so is a unit. This is false, so .
- Choose and replace by , which is irreducible by step 17. Then step 21 writes as a product of irreducibles, each an associate of one with .
- By the induction hypothesis, , and there is a bijection from to with an associate of , using step 18.
- Put and for . Then , is a permutation, and and are associates for each .
- By steps 13 and 26, is a unique factorisation domain.
Idea
Existence: if an element had no factorisation, we could keep splitting off a bad factor forever. This would give an infinite strictly increasing chain of principal ideals, and the union of such a chain is principal, which stops the chain. Uniqueness: in a principal ideal domain irreducible elements are prime. So each irreducible factor on one side divides, and so matches, a factor on the other side. We cancel it and use induction.
Reading path
To understand this page from the ground up, read these 54 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proofs Proof of cancellation in an integral domain, Proof that R/P is an integral domain iff P is prime, Proof that maximal ideals are prime, Proof of the correspondence theorem for rings, Proof that R/M is a field iff M is maximal, Proof that the only ideals of a field are zero and the whole field, Proof that in a PID a nonzero element is irreducible iff it generates a maximal ideal.
- Element definition
- Group concept
- Proposition concept
- Set definition
- Ring definition
- Implication definition
- Predicate definition
- Ordered pair definition
- Commutative ring definition
- Ideal definition
- Unit of a ring definition
- Zero divisor definition
- Existential quantifier definition
- Universal quantifier definition
- Cartesian product definition
- Divisibility in a commutative ring definition
- Ideal generated by a subset definition
- Prime ideal definition
- Field definition
- Maximal ideal definition
- Subset definition
- Two-sided ideal definition
- Integral domain definition
- Uniqueness quantifier definition
- Associate elements definition
- Prime element definition
- Principal ideal definition
- Binary relation definition
- Proof that the only ideals of a field are zero and the whole field proof
- Proof of cancellation in an integral domain proof
- Quotient ring definition
- Irreducible element definition
- The only ideals of a field are zero and the whole field statement
- Proof that R/M is a field iff M is maximal proof
- Proof that R/P is an integral domain iff P is prime proof
- Principal ideal domain definition
- Unique factorisation domain definition
- Function definition
- Cancellation in an integral domain statement
- Proof that in a PID a nonzero element is irreducible iff it generates a maximal ideal proof
- R/P is an integral domain iff P is prime statement
- Codomain definition
- Injective function definition
- Image of a set definition
- Preimage of a set definition
- In a PID a nonzero element is irreducible iff it generates a maximal ideal statement
- Surjective function definition
- Bijective function definition
- Proof of the correspondence theorem for rings proof
- Correspondence theorem for rings statement
- R/M is a field iff M is maximal statement
- Proof that maximal ideals are prime proof
- Maximal ideals are prime statement
- Proof that every principal ideal domain is a unique factorisation domain proof
Where this leads
26 pages build on this one.
- Uniqueness of finite fields of a given order
- Uniqueness of the algebraic closure
- Eisenstein's criterion
- Galois field
- PID implies UFD
- Uniqueness of splitting fields
- Impossibility of doubling the cube
- Reduction modulo p test for irreducibility
- Irreducibility of the cyclotomic polynomials over the rationals
- Gauss–Wantzel theorem
- Decomposition into generalised eigenspaces
- Proof of the impossibility of doubling the cube
- Proof of the uniqueness of splitting fields
- Model theory of algebraically closed fields
- Weil conjectures
- Proof of Eisenstein's criterion
- Cyclotomic field
- Steinitz's theorem on algebraically closed fields
- Standard conjectures on algebraic cycles
- Proof of the decomposition into generalised eigenspaces
- Proof of the irreducibility of the cyclotomic polynomials by reduction modulo primes
- Categorical theory
- Quintic equation
- Proof of the Gauss–Wantzel theorem
- Proof of the reduction modulo p test for irreducibility
- Impossibility of the classical construction problems
Further reading
About this page
| Tag | 6Q9XRQBDPP |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://6Q9XRQBDPP |
| Kind | proof |
| Writing | W0 stub |
| MSC | 13F15 |
| Proves | PID implies UFD |
| Uses | Principal ideal domain, Unique factorisation domain, Irreducible element, Prime element, Associate elements, Unit of a ring, Ideal, Ideal generated by a subset, In a PID a nonzero element is irreducible iff it generates a maximal ideal, Maximal ideals are prime, Prime ideal, Cancellation in an integral domain |
| Changed | 4 November 2026 |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
- a source with a locator (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.