Math 2.0

statement theorem

Correspondence theorem for rings

Statement

Let RR be a ring, let II be a two-sided ideal of RR and let π ⁣:R→R/I\pi \colon R \to R/I be the quotient map. Let A\mathcal{A} be the set of the left ideals JJ of RR with I⊆JI \subseteq J. Let B\mathcal{B} be the set of the left ideals of R/IR/I. The map A→B\mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}, J↦J/I=π(J)J \mapsto J/I = \pi(J), is a bijection. Its inverse is K↦π−1(K)K \mapsto \pi^{-1}(K). This bijection and its inverse preserve inclusion.

Remarks

The same bijection holds for right ideals, for two-sided ideals, and for subrings that contain II. For two-sided ideals J⊇IJ \supseteq I, the third isomorphism theorem gives (R/I)/(J/I)≅R/J(R/I)/(J/I) \cong R/J. The ideals of Z/12Z\mathbb{Z}/12\mathbb{Z} correspond to the ideals dZd\mathbb{Z} with d∣12d \mid 12, so there are six of them.

Explanations

L1 human

The ideals of a quotient ring R/IR/I are the ideals of RR that contain II, seen in the quotient. So you can understand the ideals of R/IR/I from the ideals of RR. For example, the ideals of Z/12Z\mathbb{Z}/12\mathbb{Z} come from the divisors 1,2,3,4,6,121, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12 of 1212.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 6 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Group concept
  2. Ring definition
  3. Ideal definition
  4. Two-sided ideal definition
  5. Quotient ring definition
  6. Correspondence theorem for rings statement

What depends on this

18 nodes use this node, directly or through other nodes.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isomorphism_theorems, Theorem C (rings)