Math 2.0

Commutative algebra Proof

Proof that in a PID a nonzero element is irreducible iff it generates a maximal ideal

Builds on Principal ideal domainIrreducible elementMaximal idealPrincipal idealIdeal generated by a subsetUnit of a ringCancellation in an integral domain

Proof

Let RR be a principal ideal domain and let p∈Rp \in R with p≠0p \neq 0.

  1. For b∈Rb \in R, the set bR={bt:t∈R}b R = \set{b t : t \in R} is an ideal that contains bb. Every ideal containing bb contains bRb R. So the ideal generated by bb is (b)=bR(b) = b R.
  2. For b∈Rb \in R, (b)=R(b) = R exactly when bb is a unit. If (b)=R(b) = R, then 1=bt1 = b t for some t∈Rt \in R, so bb is a unit. If bt=1b t = 1, then each r∈Rr \in R equals b(tr)∈bRb (t r) \in b R.

First suppose that pp is irreducible.

  1. Since pp is not a unit, step 2 gives (p)≠R(p) \neq R.
  2. Let II be an ideal with (p)⊆I(p) \subseteq I. Since RR is a principal ideal domain, I=(a)I = (a) for some a∈Ra \in R, a principal ideal.
  3. Since p∈(a)=aRp \in (a) = a R, there is b∈Rb \in R with p=abp = a b. Since pp is irreducible, aa is a unit or bb is a unit.
  4. If aa is a unit, then I=(a)=RI = (a) = R by step 2.
  5. If bb is a unit, then a=pb−1∈(p)a = p b^{-1} \in (p). So (a)⊆(p)(a) \subseteq (p), and I=(p)I = (p).
  6. By steps 3 to 7, (p)(p) is a maximal ideal.

Now suppose that (p)(p) is a maximal ideal.

  1. We have p≠0p \neq 0 by hypothesis. Since (p)≠R(p) \neq R, step 2 shows that pp is not a unit.
  2. Let p=abp = a b with a,b∈Ra, b \in R. Then p∈(a)p \in (a), so (p)⊆(a)(p) \subseteq (a). By maximality, (a)=(p)(a) = (p) or (a)=R(a) = R.
  3. If (a)=R(a) = R, then aa is a unit by step 2.
  4. If (a)=(p)(a) = (p), then a=pta = p t for some t∈Rt \in R. So p⋅1=p=ab=p(tb)p \cdot 1 = p = a b = p (t b).
  5. Since p≠0p \neq 0, cancellation gives tb=1t b = 1, so bb is a unit.
  6. So in every factorization p=abp = a b, one factor is a unit. With step 9, pp is irreducible.

Idea

In a principal ideal domain, an ideal containing (p)(p) has the form (a)(a) with aa a divisor of pp. So the ideals between (p)(p) and RR match the divisors of pp. The element pp has only trivial divisors exactly when there are no ideals strictly between (p)(p) and RR.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 15 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proof Proof of cancellation in an integral domain.

Show the path as a graph
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Group concept
  2. Ring definition
  3. Commutative ring definition
  4. Ideal definition
  5. Unit of a ring definition
  6. Zero divisor definition
  7. Ideal generated by a subset definition
  8. Maximal ideal definition
  9. Integral domain definition
  10. Principal ideal definition
  11. Proof of cancellation in an integral domain proof
  12. Irreducible element definition
  13. Principal ideal domain definition
  14. Cancellation in an integral domain statement
  15. Proof that in a PID a nonzero element is irreducible iff it generates a maximal ideal proof

Where this leads

67 pages build on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Principal_Ideal_of_Principal_Ideal_Domain_is_of_Irreducible_Element_iff_Maximal
About this page
TagVBJVQ0CDBM
URIm2://VBJVQ0CDBM
Kindproof
WritingW0 stub
MSC13F10
ProvesIn a PID a nonzero element is irreducible iff it generates a maximal ideal
UsesPrincipal ideal domain, Irreducible element, Maximal ideal, Principal ideal, Ideal generated by a subset, Unit of a ring, Cancellation in an integral domain
Changed4 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.