Math 2.0

Commutative algebra Proof

Proof that the product of primitive polynomials is primitive

Builds on Unique factorisation domainPrimitive polynomialR[x] is an integral domain iff R isIn a UFD irreducible elements are primePrime elementIrreducible elementUnit of a ring

Proof

Let RR be a unique factorisation domain and let f=∑iaixif = \sum_i a_i x^i and g=∑jbjxjg = \sum_j b_j x^j be primitive polynomials in R[x]R[x]. We argue by contradiction.

  1. The zero polynomial is not primitive: 00 divides all its coefficients, and 00 is not a unit since 1≠01 \neq 0. So f≠0f \neq 0 and g≠0g \neq 0.
  2. Since RR is an integral domain, R[x]R[x] is an integral domain by the theorem on polynomial rings. So fg≠0f g \neq 0.
  3. Suppose that fgf g is not primitive. Then some r∈Rr \in R that is not a unit divides every coefficient of fgf g.
  4. If r=0r = 0, then every coefficient of fgf g is 00, so fg=0f g = 0, against step 2. So r≠0r \neq 0.
  5. By unique factorisation, r=p1⋯pnr = p_1 \cdots p_n with n≥1n \ge 1 and all pkp_k irreducible. Put p=p1p = p_1. Then pp divides rr, so pp divides every coefficient of fgf g.
  6. In a unique factorisation domain, irreducible elements are prime. So pp is a prime element.
  7. Since pp is not a unit and ff is primitive, pp does not divide every aia_i. Let ss be the least index with p∤asp \nmid a_s.
  8. In the same way, let tt be the least index with p∤btp \nmid b_t.
  9. The coefficient of xs+tx^{s+t} in fgf g is c=∑i+j=s+taibjc = \sum_{i + j = s + t} a_i b_j. By step 5, p∣cp \mid c.
  10. Take a term aibja_i b_j with i+j=s+ti + j = s + t and i≠si \neq s. If i<si < s, then p∣aip \mid a_i by the choice of ss.
  11. If i>si > s, then j<tj < t, so p∣bjp \mid b_j by the choice of tt. In both cases p∣aibjp \mid a_i b_j.
  12. So asbt=c−∑aibja_s b_t = c - \sum a_i b_j is divisible by pp, where the sum runs over i+j=s+ti + j = s + t with i≠si \neq s.
  13. Since pp is prime, p∣asp \mid a_s or p∣btp \mid b_t. This contradicts steps 7 and 8.
  14. Hence every r∈Rr \in R dividing all coefficients of fgf g is a unit, and fgf g is primitive.

Idea

If fgf g were not primitive, some prime pp would divide all its coefficients. Look at the first coefficient of ff and the first coefficient of gg that pp does not divide. In the matching coefficient of fgf g, every other term is divisible by pp, so their product would be too, which is impossible for a prime.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 28 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proofs Proof that in a UFD irreducible elements are prime, Proof of cancellation in an integral domain, Proof that R[x] is an integral domain iff R is, Proof of the degree of a product over an integral domain, Proof that prime elements are irreducible in an integral domain.

Show the path as a graph
Group, concept, no evidence levelGroupconceptRing, definition, no evidence levelRingdefinitionCommutative ring, definition, no evidence levelCommutative ringdefinitionPolynomial ring, definition, no evidence levelPolynomial ringdefinitionUnit of a ring, definition, no evidence levelUnit of a ringdefinitionZero divisor, definition, no evidence levelZero divisordefinitionDivisibility in a commutative ring, definition, no evidence levelDivisibility in a com…definitionDegree of a polynomial, definition, no evidence levelDegree of a polynomialdefinitionIntegral domain, definition, no evidence levelIntegral domaindefinitionProof of cancellation in an integral domain, proof, no evidence levelProof of cancellation…proofAssociate elements, definition, no evidence levelAssociate elementsdefinitionLeading coefficient, definition, no evidence levelLeading coefficientdefinitionPrime element, definition, no evidence levelPrime elementdefinitionIrreducible element, definition, no evidence levelIrreducible elementdefinitionCancellation in an integral domain, statement, no evidence levelCancellation in an in…statementGreatest common divisor in an integral domain, definition, no evidence levelGreatest common divis…definitionProof of the degree of a product over an integral domain, proof, no evidence levelProof of the degree o…proofUnique factorisation domain, definition, no evidence levelUnique factorisation …definitionDegree of a product, statement, no evidence levelDegree of a productstatementProof that prime elements are irreducible in an integral domain, proof, no evidence levelProof that prime elem…proofContent of a polynomial, definition, no evidence levelContent of a polynomi…definitionProof that R[x] is an integral domain iff R is, proof, no evidence levelProof that R[x] is an…proofPrimitive polynomial, definition, no evidence levelPrimitive polynomialdefinitionPrime elements are irreducible in an integral domain, statement, no evidence levelPrime elements are ir…statementR[x] is an integral domain iff R is, statement, no evidence levelR[x] is an integral d…statementProof that in a UFD irreducible elements are prime, proof, no evidence levelProof that in a UFD i…proofIn a UFD irreducible elements are prime, statement, no evidence levelIn a UFD irreducible …statementProof that the product of primitive polynomials is primitive, proof, no evidence levelProof that the produc…proof
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Group concept
  2. Ring definition
  3. Commutative ring definition
  4. Polynomial ring definition
  5. Unit of a ring definition
  6. Zero divisor definition
  7. Divisibility in a commutative ring definition
  8. Degree of a polynomial definition
  9. Integral domain definition
  10. Proof of cancellation in an integral domain proof
  11. Associate elements definition
  12. Leading coefficient definition
  13. Prime element definition
  14. Irreducible element definition
  15. Cancellation in an integral domain statement
  16. Greatest common divisor in an integral domain definition
  17. Proof of the degree of a product over an integral domain proof
  18. Unique factorisation domain definition
  19. Degree of a product statement
  20. Proof that prime elements are irreducible in an integral domain proof
  21. Content of a polynomial definition
  22. Proof that R[x] is an integral domain iff R is proof
  23. Primitive polynomial definition
  24. Prime elements are irreducible in an integral domain statement
  25. R[x] is an integral domain iff R is statement
  26. Proof that in a UFD irreducible elements are prime proof
  27. In a UFD irreducible elements are prime statement
  28. Proof that the product of primitive polynomials is primitive proof

Where this leads

33 pages build on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauss%27s_lemma_(polynomials)
About this page
Tag9XYQKD59VZ
URIm2://9XYQKD59VZ
Kindproof
WritingW0 stub
MSC13F20
ProvesProduct of primitive polynomials is primitive
UsesUnique factorisation domain, Primitive polynomial, R[x] is an integral domain iff R is, In a UFD irreducible elements are prime, Prime element, Irreducible element, Unit of a ring
Changed4 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.