Math 2.0

Commutative algebra Proof

Proof of Gauss's lemma on irreducibility over a UFD

Builds on Unique factorisation domainIntegral domainField of fractionsFieldPrimitive polynomialIrreducible polynomialIrreducible elementR[x] is an integral domain iff R isDegree of a productUnit of a ringIn a UFD irreducible elements are primePrime elementCancellation in an integral domainDegree of a polynomial

Proof

Let RR be a unique factorisation domain with field of fractions KK. We identify a∈Ra \in R with a/1∈Ka/1 \in K, so R[x]⊆K[x]R[x] \subseteq K[x]. Let f∈R[x]f \in R[x] be primitive.

  1. The rings RR and KK are integral domains. So R[x]R[x] and K[x]K[x] are integral domains by the theorem on polynomial rings, and degrees add in products.
  2. If uv=1u v = 1 in R[x]R[x], then deg⁡u+deg⁡v=0\deg u + \deg v = 0, so uu and vv are constants of RR. So the units of R[x]R[x] are the units of RR.
  3. In the same way, the units of K[x]K[x] are constants. Every nonzero constant is a unit, since KK is a field. So the units of K[x]K[x] are the polynomials of degree 00.
  4. Let p∈Rp \in R be prime and let G=∑iaixiG = \sum_i a_i x^i and H=∑jbjxjH = \sum_j b_j x^j in R[x]R[x]. Suppose pp divides every coefficient of GHG H, but not every aia_i and not every bjb_j.
  5. Let ss and tt be the least indices with p∤asp \nmid a_s and p∤btp \nmid b_t. In the coefficient ∑i+j=s+taibj\sum_{i + j = s + t} a_i b_j, each term with i<si < s or j<tj < t is divisible by pp.
  6. Every term other than asbta_s b_t has i<si < s or j<tj < t. So p∣asbtp \mid a_s b_t, and p∣asp \mid a_s or p∣btp \mid b_t. This is a contradiction.
  7. So if a prime pp divides every coefficient of GHG H, then pp divides every coefficient of GG or every coefficient of HH.
  8. Claim: if r∈Rr \in R, r≠0r \neq 0, and rf=GHr f = G H with G,H∈R[x]G, H \in R[x], then f=G′H′f = G' H' with G′,H′∈R[x]G', H' \in R[x], deg⁡G′=deg⁡G\deg G' = \deg G and deg⁡H′=deg⁡H\deg H' = \deg H.
  9. Every nonzero rr is r=up1⋯pnr = u p_1 \cdots p_n with uu a unit, n≥0n \ge 0 and all pkp_k irreducible. We prove the claim by induction on nn.
  10. If n=0n = 0, then r=ur = u is a unit. Take G′=u−1GG' = u^{-1} G and H′=HH' = H.
  11. If n≥1n \ge 1, put p=p1p = p_1 and r′=up2⋯pnr' = u p_2 \cdots p_n. Since irreducible elements are prime in RR, pp is prime.
  12. The prime pp divides every coefficient of rf=GHr f = G H. By step 7 we may assume that pp divides every coefficient of GG, so G=pG1G = p G_1 with G1∈R[x]G_1 \in R[x] and deg⁡G1=deg⁡G\deg G_1 = \deg G.
  13. Then p(r′f)=p(G1H)p (r' f) = p (G_1 H). Cancelling p≠0p \neq 0 in R[x]R[x] gives r′f=G1Hr' f = G_1 H. The induction hypothesis for r′r' proves the claim.
  14. The polynomial ff is not 00, since the nonunit 00 divides every coefficient of 00. If deg⁡f=0\deg f = 0, then f=a∈Rf = a \in R divides itself, so aa is a unit of RR.
  15. Then ff is a unit of R[x]R[x] and of K[x]K[x]. So ff is irreducible in neither ring, and the statement holds. From now on, let deg⁡f≥1\deg f \ge 1.
  16. By steps 2 and 3, ff is a nonzero nonunit both in R[x]R[x] and in K[x]K[x].
  17. Suppose that ff is irreducible in K[x]K[x], and let f=ghf = g h with g,h∈R[x]g, h \in R[x]. Then gg or hh is a unit of K[x]K[x], say gg.
  18. By step 3, gg is a nonzero constant a∈Ra \in R. Then aa divides every coefficient of f=ahf = a h. Since ff is primitive, aa is a unit of RR, hence of R[x]R[x].
  19. So ff is irreducible in R[x]R[x].
  20. Conversely, suppose that ff is irreducible in R[x]R[x]. Suppose that f=ghf = g h in K[x]K[x] with gg and hh not units of K[x]K[x].
  21. Since f≠0f \neq 0, also g,h≠0g, h \neq 0. By step 3, deg⁡g≥1\deg g \ge 1 and deg⁡h≥1\deg h \ge 1.
  22. Write the coefficients of gg as uk/vku_k / v_k with uk,vk∈Ru_k, v_k \in R and vk≠0v_k \neq 0. Let dd be the product of the vkv_k. Then d≠0d \neq 0 and G=dgG = d g lies in R[x]R[x].
  23. In the same way, there is e∈Re \in R with e≠0e \neq 0 and H=eh∈R[x]H = e h \in R[x]. Then (de)f=GH(d e) f = G H in R[x]R[x], with deg⁡G=deg⁡g\deg G = \deg g and deg⁡H=deg⁡h\deg H = \deg h.
  24. By the claim of step 8, f=G′H′f = G' H' with G′,H′∈R[x]G', H' \in R[x] of degrees at least 11. By step 2, neither is a unit of R[x]R[x].
  25. This contradicts the irreducibility of ff in R[x]R[x]. So ff is irreducible in K[x]K[x], which proves the equivalence.

Idea

A factorisation over KK can be moved to a factorisation over RR: clear the denominators, then remove the extra constant one prime at a time. Each prime of the constant divides all coefficients of one factor, because it divides all coefficients of the product. Primitivity rules out constant factors over RR, so the two notions of irreducibility agree.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 31 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proofs Proof that in a UFD irreducible elements are prime, Proof of cancellation in an integral domain, Proof that R[x] is an integral domain iff R is, Proof of the degree of a product over an integral domain, Proof that prime elements are irreducible in an integral domain.

Show the path as a graph
Group, concept, no evidence levelGroupconceptRing, definition, no evidence levelRingdefinitionCommutative ring, definition, no evidence levelCommutative ringdefinitionPolynomial ring, definition, no evidence levelPolynomial ringdefinitionUnit of a ring, definition, no evidence levelUnit of a ringdefinitionZero divisor, definition, no evidence levelZero divisordefinitionDivisibility in a commutative ring, definition, no evidence levelDivisibility in a com…definitionDegree of a polynomial, definition, no evidence levelDegree of a polynomialdefinitionField, definition, no evidence levelFielddefinitionIntegral domain, definition, no evidence levelIntegral domaindefinitionAssociate elements, definition, no evidence levelAssociate elementsdefinitionLeading coefficient, definition, no evidence levelLeading coefficientdefinitionPrime element, definition, no evidence levelPrime elementdefinitionProof of cancellation in an integral domain, proof, no evidence levelProof of cancellation…proofField of fractions, definition, no evidence levelField of fractionsdefinitionIrreducible element, definition, no evidence levelIrreducible elementdefinitionGreatest common divisor in an integral domain, definition, no evidence levelGreatest common divis…definitionProof of the degree of a product over an integral domain, proof, no evidence levelProof of the degree o…proofUnique factorisation domain, definition, no evidence levelUnique factorisation …definitionCancellation in an integral domain, statement, no evidence levelCancellation in an in…statementIrreducible polynomial, definition, no evidence levelIrreducible polynomialdefinitionContent of a polynomial, definition, no evidence levelContent of a polynomi…definitionDegree of a product, statement, no evidence levelDegree of a productstatementProof that prime elements are irreducible in an integral domain, proof, no evidence levelProof that prime elem…proofPrimitive polynomial, definition, no evidence levelPrimitive polynomialdefinitionProof that R[x] is an integral domain iff R is, proof, no evidence levelProof that R[x] is an…proofPrime elements are irreducible in an integral domain, statement, no evidence levelPrime elements are ir…statementR[x] is an integral domain iff R is, statement, no evidence levelR[x] is an integral d…statementProof that in a UFD irreducible elements are prime, proof, no evidence levelProof that in a UFD i…proofIn a UFD irreducible elements are prime, statement, no evidence levelIn a UFD irreducible …statementProof of Gauss's lemma on irreducibility over a UFD, proof, no evidence levelProof of Gauss's lemm…proof
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Group concept
  2. Ring definition
  3. Commutative ring definition
  4. Polynomial ring definition
  5. Unit of a ring definition
  6. Zero divisor definition
  7. Divisibility in a commutative ring definition
  8. Degree of a polynomial definition
  9. Field definition
  10. Integral domain definition
  11. Associate elements definition
  12. Leading coefficient definition
  13. Prime element definition
  14. Proof of cancellation in an integral domain proof
  15. Field of fractions definition
  16. Irreducible element definition
  17. Greatest common divisor in an integral domain definition
  18. Proof of the degree of a product over an integral domain proof
  19. Unique factorisation domain definition
  20. Cancellation in an integral domain statement
  21. Irreducible polynomial definition
  22. Content of a polynomial definition
  23. Degree of a product statement
  24. Proof that prime elements are irreducible in an integral domain proof
  25. Primitive polynomial definition
  26. Proof that R[x] is an integral domain iff R is proof
  27. Prime elements are irreducible in an integral domain statement
  28. R[x] is an integral domain iff R is statement
  29. Proof that in a UFD irreducible elements are prime proof
  30. In a UFD irreducible elements are prime statement
  31. Proof of Gauss's lemma on irreducibility over a UFD proof

Where this leads

29 pages build on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauss%27s_lemma_(polynomials)
About this page
TagS3X4HT55RE
URIm2://S3X4HT55RE
Kindproof
WritingW0 stub
MSC13F20
ProvesGauss's lemma
UsesUnique factorisation domain, Integral domain, Field of fractions, Field, Primitive polynomial, Irreducible polynomial, Irreducible element, R[x] is an integral domain iff R is, Degree of a product, Unit of a ring, In a UFD irreducible elements are prime, Prime element, Cancellation in an integral domain, Degree of a polynomial
Changed4 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.