Math 2.0

Group theory and generalizations Finite groups Lemma

Zassenhaus lemma

Builds on SubgroupNormal subgroupQuotient groupSecond isomorphism theorem

Statement

Let GG be a group. Let AA and BB be subgroups of GG, let A∗A^* be a normal subgroup of AA, and let B∗B^* be a normal subgroup of BB. Then:

  1. A∗(A∩B∗)A^*(A \cap B^*) is a normal subgroup of A∗(A∩B)A^*(A \cap B);
  2. B∗(A∗∩B)B^*(A^* \cap B) is a normal subgroup of B∗(A∩B)B^*(A \cap B);
  3. there is an isomorphism of quotient groups A∗(A∩B)A∗(A∩B∗)≅B∗(A∩B)B∗(A∗∩B).\frac{A^*(A \cap B)}{A^*(A \cap B^*)} \cong \frac{B^*(A \cap B)}{B^*(A^* \cap B)}.

Remarks

Let D=(A∗∩B)(A∩B∗)D = (A^* \cap B)(A \cap B^*). It is a normal subgroup of A∩BA \cap B, and the second isomorphism theorem shows that the left quotient is isomorphic to (A∩B)/D(A \cap B)/D. The same argument with AA and BB exchanged shows that the right quotient is also isomorphic to (A∩B)/D(A \cap B)/D. The lemma is also called the butterfly lemma, after the shape of the diagram of the subgroups involved. For A∗={e}A^* = \{e\} and B∗={e}B^* = \{e\} the lemma says only that A∩B≅A∩BA \cap B \cong A \cap B; the content appears when A∗A^* and B∗B^* are large.

Going deeper

For a student

The lemma is the key step in the proof of the Schreier refinement theorem, which in turn proves the Jordan–Hölder theorem. It is a consequence of the second isomorphism theorem alone. The same statement and proof hold for modules over a ring, with sums in place of products of subgroups.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 35 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proofs Proof that the kernel is a normal subgroup, Proof that a homomorphism is injective iff its kernel is trivial, Proof of the first isomorphism theorem, Proof of the uniqueness of inverses, Proof of the cancellation laws.

Show the path as a graph
Binary operation, definition, no evidence levelBinary operationdefinitionGroup, concept, no evidence levelGroupconceptNormal subgroup, concept, no evidence levelNormal subgroupconceptQuotient group, concept, no evidence levelQuotient groupconceptSubgroup, concept, no evidence levelSubgroupconceptIdentity element, definition, no evidence levelIdentity elementdefinitionConjugate elements, definition, no evidence levelConjugate elementsdefinitionGroup homomorphism, definition, no evidence levelGroup homomorphismdefinitionSubgroup, definition, no evidence levelSubgroupdefinitionInverse element, definition, no evidence levelInverse elementdefinitionConjugate subgroup, definition, no evidence levelConjugate subgroupdefinitionGroup isomorphism, definition, no evidence levelGroup isomorphismdefinitionKernel of a homomorphism, definition, no evidence levelKernel of a homomorph…definitionImage of a homomorphism, definition, no evidence levelImage of a homomorphi…definitionLeft coset, definition, no evidence levelLeft cosetdefinitionProduct of two subgroups, definition, no evidence levelProduct of two subgro…definitionRight coset, definition, no evidence levelRight cosetdefinitionProof of the cancellation laws, proof, no evidence levelProof of the cancella…proofProof of the uniqueness of inverses, proof, no evidence levelProof of the uniquene…proofNormal subgroup, definition, no evidence levelNormal subgroupdefinitionCancellation laws, statement, no evidence levelCancellation lawsstatementUniqueness of inverses, statement, no evidence levelUniqueness of inversesstatementProduct of a subgroup and a normal subgroup is a subgroup, statement, no evidence levelProduct of a subgroup…statementNormality via left and right cosets, statement, no evidence levelNormality via left an…statementHomomorphisms preserve identity and inverses, statement, no evidence levelHomomorphisms preserv…statementQuotient group, definition, no evidence levelQuotient groupdefinitionProof that a homomorphism is injective iff its kernel is trivial, proof, no evidence levelProof that a homomorp…proofProof that the kernel is a normal subgroup, proof, no evidence levelProof that the kernel…proofUniversal property of the quotient group, statement, no evidence levelUniversal property of…statementA homomorphism is injective iff its kernel is trivial, statement, no evidence levelA homomorphism is inj…statementThe kernel is a normal subgroup, statement, no evidence levelThe kernel is a norma…statementProof of the first isomorphism theorem, proof, no evidence levelProof of the first is…proofFirst isomorphism theorem, statement, no evidence levelFirst isomorphism the…statementSecond isomorphism theorem, statement, no evidence levelSecond isomorphism th…statementZassenhaus lemma, statement, no evidence levelZassenhaus lemmastatement
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Binary operation definition
  2. Group concept
  3. Normal subgroup concept
  4. Quotient group concept
  5. Subgroup concept
  6. Identity element definition
  7. Conjugate elements definition
  8. Group homomorphism definition
  9. Subgroup definition
  10. Inverse element definition
  11. Conjugate subgroup definition
  12. Group isomorphism definition
  13. Kernel of a homomorphism definition
  14. Image of a homomorphism definition
  15. Left coset definition
  16. Product of two subgroups definition
  17. Right coset definition
  18. Proof of the cancellation laws proof
  19. Proof of the uniqueness of inverses proof
  20. Normal subgroup definition
  21. Cancellation laws statement
  22. Uniqueness of inverses statement
  23. Product of a subgroup and a normal subgroup is a subgroup statement
  24. Normality via left and right cosets statement
  25. Homomorphisms preserve identity and inverses statement
  26. Quotient group definition
  27. Proof that a homomorphism is injective iff its kernel is trivial proof
  28. Proof that the kernel is a normal subgroup proof
  29. Universal property of the quotient group statement
  30. A homomorphism is injective iff its kernel is trivial statement
  31. The kernel is a normal subgroup statement
  32. Proof of the first isomorphism theorem proof
  33. First isomorphism theorem statement
  34. Second isomorphism theorem statement
  35. Zassenhaus lemma statement

Where this leads

1 page builds on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zassenhaus_lemma
About this page
Tag21JJ523V95
URIm2://21JJ523V95
Kindstatement, lemma
WritingW0 stub
MSC20E15, 20D30
StatusThis copy of the site has no build data. Run m2 status 21JJ523V95.
AboutNormal subgroup, Quotient group
UsesSubgroup, Normal subgroup, Quotient group, Second isomorphism theorem
Same as
Changed2 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

Used by