Math 2.0

Number theory Proof

Proof of the product of the gcd and the lcm

Builds on Greatest common divisorLeast common multipleBézout's identityDivisibility

Proof

We show that ab/gcd⁡(a,b)ab / \gcd(a, b) is the least positive common multiple, using Bézout's identity.

  1. Let aa and bb be natural numbers.
  2. If a=0a = 0 or b=0b = 0, then lcm⁡(a,b)=0\operatorname{lcm}(a, b) = 0 by the convention for the least common multiple. So both sides of the equation are 00.
  3. Now let a>0a > 0 and b>0b > 0. Put d=gcd⁡(a,b)d = \gcd(a, b), the greatest common divisor. Then d≥1d \ge 1, because 11 is a common divisor.
  4. Since d∣ad \mid a and d∣bd \mid b, write a=da′a = d a' and b=db′b = d b' with positive integers a′a' and b′b'.
  5. Put m=a′bm = a' b. Then mm is a positive integer, and dm=da′b=abd m = d a' b = a b.
  6. Also m=a′db′=ab′m = a' d b' = a b'. So a∣ma \mid m and b∣mb \mid m, and mm is a positive common multiple of aa and bb.
  7. By Bézout's identity, there are integers xx and yy with ax+by=da x + b y = d.
  8. Let cc be a positive common multiple of aa and bb. Write c=auc = a u and c=bvc = b v with integers uu and vv.
  9. Then cd=cax+cby=(bv)ax+(au)by=ab(vx+uy)c d = c a x + c b y = (b v) a x + (a u) b y = a b (v x + u y).
  10. By step 5, ab=dma b = d m, so cd=dm(vx+uy)c d = d m (v x + u y). Since d≠0d \neq 0, we get c=m(vx+uy)c = m (v x + u y).
  11. Here c>0c > 0 and m>0m > 0, so the integer vx+uyv x + u y is at least 11. Hence c≥mc \ge m.
  12. By steps 6 and 11, mm is the smallest positive common multiple, so lcm⁡(a,b)=m\operatorname{lcm}(a, b) = m.
  13. Therefore gcd⁡(a,b)⋅lcm⁡(a,b)=dm=ab\gcd(a, b) \cdot \operatorname{lcm}(a, b) = d m = a b.

Idea

Dividing abab by the gcd removes the common part of aa and bb once, and the result is still a multiple of both. Bézout's identity writes the gcd as ax+byax + by, and this shows that every common multiple is a multiple of ab/gcd⁡(a,b)ab/\gcd(a,b).

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 23 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proofs Proof of Bézout's identity, Proof of the commutativity of addition by induction, Proof of strong induction from ordinary induction, Proof of the well-ordering principle from strong induction, Proof of the division algorithm.

Show the path as a graph
Definition by recursion, concept, no evidence levelDefinition by recursi…conceptDivisibility, definition, no evidence levelDivisibilitydefinitionMathematical induction, concept, no evidence levelMathematical inductionconceptNatural numbers, object, no evidence levelNatural numbersobjectPeano axioms, concept, no evidence levelPeano axiomsconceptGreatest common divisor, definition, no evidence levelGreatest common divis…definitionLeast common multiple, definition, no evidence levelLeast common multipledefinitionSuccessor function, definition, no evidence levelSuccessor functiondefinitionAddition of natural numbers, definition, no evidence levelAddition of natural n…definitionThe successor function is injective, statement, no evidence levelThe successor functio…statementZero is not a successor, statement, no evidence levelZero is not a success…statementProof of the commutativity of addition by induction, proof, no evidence levelProof of the commutat…proofOrder on the natural numbers, definition, no evidence levelOrder on the natural …definitionCommutativity of addition, statement, no evidence levelCommutativity of addi…statementProof of strong induction from ordinary induction, proof, no evidence levelProof of strong induc…proofStrong induction, statement, no evidence levelStrong inductionstatementProof of the well-ordering principle from strong induction, proof, no evidence levelProof of the well-ord…proofWell-ordering principle, statement, no evidence levelWell-ordering princip…statementProof of the division algorithm, proof, no evidence levelProof of the division…proofDivision algorithm, statement, no evidence levelDivision algorithmstatementProof of Bézout's identity, proof, no evidence levelProof of Bézout's ide…proofBézout's identity, statement, no evidence levelBézout's identitystatementProof of the product of the gcd and the lcm, proof, no evidence levelProof of the product …proof
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Definition by recursion concept
  2. Divisibility definition
  3. Mathematical induction concept
  4. Natural numbers object
  5. Peano axioms concept
  6. Greatest common divisor definition
  7. Least common multiple definition
  8. Successor function definition
  9. Addition of natural numbers definition
  10. The successor function is injective statement
  11. Zero is not a successor statement
  12. Proof of the commutativity of addition by induction proof
  13. Order on the natural numbers definition
  14. Commutativity of addition statement
  15. Proof of strong induction from ordinary induction proof
  16. Strong induction statement
  17. Proof of the well-ordering principle from strong induction proof
  18. Well-ordering principle statement
  19. Proof of the division algorithm proof
  20. Division algorithm statement
  21. Proof of Bézout's identity proof
  22. Bézout's identity statement
  23. Proof of the product of the gcd and the lcm proof

Where this leads

3 pages build on this one.

Further reading

  1. Web https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Product_of_GCD_and_LCM, Proof 5
About this page
TagA9HVTKG9R2
URIm2://A9HVTKG9R2
Kindproof
WritingW0 stub
MSC11A05
ProvesProduct of the gcd and the lcm
UsesGreatest common divisor, Least common multiple, Bézout's identity, Divisibility
Changed4 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.