The Dirichlet function is not Riemann integrable
Counterexample
Let be the Dirichlet function: for rational and for irrational . Each subinterval of positive length contains both rational and irrational numbers. So for each partition , and . The upper Darboux integral is and the lower one is . So is not Riemann integrable.
Remarks
The function is bounded, so the failure is not caused by unboundedness. The function is Lebesgue integrable, with Lebesgue integral , since has measure zero. It is the pointwise limit of Riemann integrable functions. So pointwise limits do not keep Riemann integrability.
Explanations
L1 human
Every Riemann sum of this function is or or in between, depending only on the choice of tags. So the sums cannot settle down to one number.
What this node needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
- edge refutes or not_instance_of out (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.
What this needs
To read this node, read these 18 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.
- no evidence level
- Limit point of a set definition
- Partition of an interval definition
- Sequence definition
- Limit of a function definition
- Mesh of a partition definition
- Riemann sum definition
- Real sequence definition
- Continuity at a point definition
- Riemann integrable function definition
- Bounded sequence definition
- Limit of a sequence definition
- Riemann integral definition
- Upper and lower Darboux sums definition
- Sequential continuity definition
- Dirichlet function counterexample
- Upper and lower Darboux integrals definition
- Darboux and Riemann integrals agree statement
- The Dirichlet function is not Riemann integrable counterexample
Sources
- Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirichlet_function, Integration properties
What links here
No node links to this node yet.