Field theory and polynomials Proof
Proof that the complex numbers cannot be ordered
Builds on Ordered fieldi squared is minus oneTotal orderPartial orderThe complex numbers form a fieldComplex numbers
Proof
We argue by contradiction.
- Assume that is a total order on that makes an ordered field. Its two axioms are: implies , and , imply .
- Claim: for each , we have . Write with real. Then . The product rule for complex numbers gives .
- Claim: for each . Since the order is total, or .
- If , then the second axiom with gives .
- If , the first axiom with gives . The second axiom gives , which is by step 2.
- By step 3 with , we get .
- By step 3 with , we get . By i squared is minus one, this says .
- Adding to both sides of gives , by the first axiom.
- A total order is a partial order, so it is antisymmetric. Steps 6 and 8 then give .
- But in , because is a field. This contradiction shows that no such order exists.
Idea
In any ordered field every square is nonnegative, so . In the number is also a square, namely , so as well. These two facts force , which is impossible.
Reading path
To understand this page from the ground up, read these 35 pages in order. The foundations come first. The path takes the proofs Proof of the equality of complex numbers, Proof that i squared is minus one, Proof that the complex numbers form a field.
Show the path as a graph
- no evidence level
- Complex numbers object
- Complex numbers as pairs of reals concept
- Element definition
- Group concept
- Imaginary unit object
- Ordered field definition
- Proposition concept
- Real numbers object
- Real and imaginary parts definition
- Proof that i squared is minus one proof
- Set definition
- Ring definition
- Implication definition
- Predicate definition
- The reals form a field statement
- i squared is minus one statement
- Ordered pair definition
- Commutative ring definition
- Unit of a ring definition
- Universal quantifier definition
- Cartesian product definition
- Proof of the equality of complex numbers proof
- Field definition
- Subset definition
- Equality of complex numbers statement
- Binary relation definition
- Antisymmetric relation definition
- Reflexive relation definition
- Transitive relation definition
- Proof that the complex numbers form a field proof
- Preorder definition
- The complex numbers form a field statement
- Partial order definition
- Total order definition
- Proof that the complex numbers cannot be ordered proof
Where this leads
3 pages build on this one.
Further reading
- Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordered_field, Orderability of fields
About this page
| Tag | 9DM7JGR0K4 |
|---|---|
| URI | m2://9DM7JGR0K4 |
| Kind | proof |
| Writing | W0 stub |
| MSC | 12J15 |
| Proves | The complex numbers cannot be ordered |
| Uses | Ordered field, i squared is minus one, Total order, Partial order, The complex numbers form a field, Complex numbers |
| Changed | 4 November 2026 |
Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub
What this page needs for W1
- an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.
What links here
No page links to this page yet.