Math 2.0

Operator theory Definition

Lyapunov–Schmidt reduction

Builds on Banach spaceKernel of a linear mapProjectionImplicit function theoremContinuously differentiable function

Definition

Let XX, YY and Λ\Lambda be Banach spaces, let U⊆X×ΛU \subseteq X \times \Lambda be an open neighbourhood of (0,0)(0, 0), and let F ⁣:U→YF \colon U \to Y be continuously differentiable with F(0,0)=0F(0, 0) = 0. Let L=DxF(0,0) ⁣:X→YL = D_x F(0, 0) \colon X \to Y, and assume that LL is a Fredholm operator:

  1. the kernel N=ker⁡LN = \ker L has finite dimension;
  2. the range R=L(X)R = L(X) is closed and has a complement of finite dimension in YY.

Choose closed subspaces X1X_1 and Y1Y_1 with X=N⊕X1X = N \oplus X_1 and Y=R⊕Y1Y = R \oplus Y_1, and let Q ⁣:Y→RQ \colon Y \to R be the continuous projection onto RR along Y1Y_1. The restriction of QLQL to X1X_1 is an isomorphism onto RR. Write x=v+wx = v + w with v∈Nv \in N and w∈X1w \in X_1. By the implicit function theorem, the equation QF(v+w,λ)=0Q F(v + w, \lambda) = 0 has a unique solution w=W(v,λ)w = W(v, \lambda) near 00. Here (v,λ)(v, \lambda) is near (0,0)(0, 0), and W(0,0)=0W(0, 0) = 0. The Lyapunov–Schmidt reduction of F=0F = 0 at (0,0)(0, 0) is the bifurcation equation (I−Q) F(v+W(v,λ),λ)=0,(I - Q)\, F\big(v + W(v, \lambda), \lambda\big) = 0, for v∈Nv \in N and λ\lambda near 00. Its values lie in Y1Y_1.

Remarks

Near (0,0)(0, 0), the solutions of F(x,λ)=0F(x, \lambda) = 0 are exactly the points x=v+W(v,λ)x = v + W(v, \lambda) with (v,λ)(v, \lambda) a solution of the bifurcation equation. Since NN and Y1Y_1 are finite-dimensional, this is a system of dim⁡Y1\dim Y_1 equations in dim⁡N\dim N unknowns.

Example: X=Y=ℝ2X = Y = \R^2, Λ=ℝ\Lambda = \R, F(x,y,λ)=(λx−xy, y−x2)F(x, y, \lambda) = (\lambda x - x y,\ y - x^2). Here L=(0001)L = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}, so NN is the xx-axis and RR is the yy-axis; take X1=RX_1 = R and Y1=NY_1 = N. The equation QF=0Q F = 0 is y−x2=0y - x^2 = 0, so W(x,λ)=x2W(x, \lambda) = x^2. The bifurcation equation is λx−x3=0\lambda x - x^3 = 0, which has a pitchfork bifurcation at λ=0\lambda = 0.

Non-example: on the sequence space ℓ2\ell^2, the operator L(x1,x2,…)=(x1,x2/2,x3/3,…)L(x_1, x_2, \ldots) = (x_1, x_2/2, x_3/3, \ldots) has trivial kernel, but its range is dense and not closed, so clause 2 fails.

Reading path

To understand this page from the ground up, read these 24 pages in order. The foundations come first.

Show the path as a graph
Banach space, concept, no evidence levelBanach spaceconceptContinuously differentiable function, concept, no evidence levelContinuously differen…conceptEuclidean space, object, no evidence levelEuclidean spaceobjectFunction, concept, no evidence levelFunctionconceptFunction composition, concept, no evidence levelFunction compositionconceptKernel of a linear map, concept, no evidence levelKernel of a linear mapconceptProjection, concept, no evidence levelProjectionconceptFréchet derivative, definition, no evidence levelFréchet derivativedefinitionFunction of several variables, concept, no evidence levelFunction of several v…conceptPartial derivative, concept, no evidence levelPartial derivativeconceptLimit of a function of several variables, concept, no evidence levelLimit of a function o…conceptPartial derivative, definition, no evidence levelPartial derivativedefinitionDifferentiable function of several variables, definition, no evidence levelDifferentiable functi…definitionHigher partial derivatives, definition, no evidence levelHigher partial deriva…definitionJacobian matrix, definition, no evidence levelJacobian matrixdefinitionDifferentiable on an open set, definition, no evidence levelDifferentiable on an …definitionChain rule in several variables, statement, no evidence levelChain rule in several…statementIterated derivative, definition, no evidence levelIterated derivativedefinitionJacobian determinant, definition, no evidence levelJacobian determinantdefinitionDerivative of the inverse function, statement, no evidence levelDerivative of the inv…statementC^k function characterised by continuous derivatives, statement, no evidence levelC^k function characte…statementInverse function theorem, statement, no evidence levelInverse function theo…statementImplicit function theorem, statement, no evidence levelImplicit function the…statementLyapunov–Schmidt reduction, definition, no evidence levelLyapunov–Schmidt redu…definition
Each page uses the pages above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows how strong the evidence is, and the box also gives it as text. The list has the same pages.
  • no evidence level
  1. Banach space concept
  2. Continuously differentiable function concept
  3. Euclidean space object
  4. Function concept
  5. Function composition concept
  6. Kernel of a linear map concept
  7. Projection concept
  8. Fréchet derivative definition
  9. Function of several variables concept
  10. Partial derivative concept
  11. Limit of a function of several variables concept
  12. Partial derivative definition
  13. Differentiable function of several variables definition
  14. Higher partial derivatives definition
  15. Jacobian matrix definition
  16. Differentiable on an open set definition
  17. Chain rule in several variables statement
  18. Iterated derivative definition
  19. Jacobian determinant definition
  20. Derivative of the inverse function statement
  21. C^k function characterised by continuous derivatives statement
  22. Inverse function theorem statement
  23. Implicit function theorem statement
  24. Lyapunov–Schmidt reduction definition

Further reading

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyapunov%E2%80%93Schmidt_reduction
About this page
TagCC666JT89X
URIm2://CC666JT89X
Kinddefinition
WritingW0 stub
MSC47J15, 34C23
DefinesLyapunov–Schmidt reduction
UsesBanach space, Kernel of a linear map, Projection, Implicit function theorem, Continuously differentiable function
Changed2 November 2026

Markdown · JSON · Edit on GitHub

What this page needs for W1

  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)
  • a source with a locator (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a page is. They do not measure its truth.

What links here

No page links to this page yet.