Math 2.0

statement theorem

Holomorphic functions are analytic

Statement

Let U⊆CU \subseteq \mathbb{C} be an open set and let f:U→Cf : U \to \mathbb{C} be holomorphic on UU. Let c∈Uc \in U and r>0r > 0 be such that the open disc D={z:∣z−c∣<r}D = \{z : |z - c| < r\} is contained in UU. Then there are complex numbers a0,a1,a2,…a_0, a_1, a_2, \dots such that the power series ∑n≥0an(z−c)n\sum_{n \ge 0} a_n (z - c)^n converges to f(z)f(z) for each z∈Dz \in D. For each ρ\rho with 0<ρ<r0 < \rho < r, the coefficients are an=12πi∮∣z−c∣=ρf(z)(z−c)n+1 dz.a_n = \frac{1}{2 \pi i} \oint_{|z - c| = \rho} \frac{f(z)}{(z - c)^{n+1}} \, dz. In particular, ff is analytic on UU: near each point of UU, ff is the sum of a convergent power series.

Remarks

Proof idea: in Cauchy's integral formula, expand 1z−a\frac{1}{z - a} as a geometric series in a−cz−c\frac{a - c}{z - c}, and integrate term by term. The radius of convergence of the Taylor series at cc is at least the distance from cc to the boundary of UU. For example, the Taylor series of 1/(1−z)1/(1 - z) at 00 has radius 11, the distance from 00 to the point 11 where the function is not defined. The converse is also true: power series are holomorphic in their disc of convergence.

Explanations

L1 human

A function with one complex derivative everywhere on an open set is automatically equal to its Taylor series near each point. This is very different from real functions, where a differentiable function can fail to have a second derivative.

What this node needs for W1
  • an inventory row: the row of the inventory that the node accounts for (0 of 1)

The writing levels say how complete the text of a node is. They do not measure its truth.

What this needs

To read this node, read these 17 nodes in this order. The foundations come first, and the list ends with this node.

Each node uses the nodes above it. The colour of the bar on a box shows the evidence level, and the box also gives it as text. The list below has the same nodes.
  • no evidence level
  1. Complex numbers object
  2. Real numbers object
  3. Set bounded above definition
  4. Complex exponential definition
  5. Contour integral definition
  6. Power series in the complex plane definition
  7. Real and imaginary parts definition
  8. Supremum definition
  9. Circle integral definition
  10. Completeness axiom statement
  11. Existence of square roots of nonnegative reals statement
  12. Square root definition
  13. Modulus of a complex number definition
  14. Complex differentiability definition
  15. Holomorphic function definition
  16. Cauchy's integral formula statement
  17. Holomorphic functions are analytic statement

What depends on this

18 nodes use this node, directly or through other nodes.

Sources

  1. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analyticity_of_holomorphic_functions, Proof
  2. Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analyticity_of_holomorphic_functions, lead section